Sunday, October 23, 2011

This has Democrat fingerprints all over it .......

JustiaGate
Where  someone erased legal precedent by altering references to the words
 "Minor V. Happersett."
—  Article 2 Section 1's natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship




Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1's natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent.  In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.

Where was Sandy Berger?

Note that the shenanigans began in June. 

By Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 2, 2008

The Senate has unanimously declared John McCain a natural-born citizen, eligible to be president of the United States.

June was the month that questions about Barry's birth caused his handlers to begin a series of fraudulent document creation that persists today. I'm just saying.

 Look at how, what's the word?  "Reckless."  How almost hysterically reckless the mission was carried out.  Just a year prior Clinton's former national security adviser  Sandy Berger stole and evidently destroyed  original, uncatalogued, highly classified terrorism (Clinton Admin) documents from the National Archives.  This was just prior to the Senate's 9-11 Commission hearings.  I'm suggesting that Democrats will do ANYTHING  when exposure of their failings, misdeeds, or  felonies are to be exposed.  Ahem.

Meanwhile, at the “Supreme Court Center” of the influential legal research website Justia.com, efforts were underway corrupting at least 25 Supreme Court cases by erasing references to the words "Minor V. Happersett" along with references to other relevant cases on the issue along with the insertion of misleading numerical ciations.  And In two documented cases actual text was removed.

Clearly this was done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for them, even before Obama would win the Democratic Nomination at the DNC Convention in Denver, Colorado in August '08. This is premeditation and intent to deceive.

So far, 25 corrupted SCOTUS have been identified, and this number may continue to rise as the scope of the tampering becomes apparent.   [Read the full story]

It goes without saying that this will be Sixty-Minutes' headline feature tonight.  Unless CBS, like me, are certain this is an Obama crime.  Then, nothing.  Let's wait and see.

Nice catch stoo-pid

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Only problem is that this case does not say that a natural born citizen is exclusively a child born in the US of two American citizens. It says there is no doubt that such a child is natural born and then goes on to say there are possibly other categories. It does not definitively state that those other categories are not natural born - it simply does not address the question. Thus the Court did not address the status of someone born outside the US to two American citizen parents or someone born in the US whose parents were not citizens.

However, as one of the comments at the bottom of the linked article points out, real lawyers do not use Justia for legal research - they typically use Lexis or Westlaw so altering the records on this database would seem pointless.
.

I-RIGHT-I said...

The cancer can not be removed by the ballot.

Chuck Martel said...

"Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." Minor v. Happersett, 88 US 162, 167-68 (1875).

Justia isn't just some hack-job website. They are highly respected. If someone has been doing this at Justia, then kneecapping is too good for them.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

It seems to me that the crime lies in altering, and misdirecting the rule of law. What was altered is beside the point, although somebody thought natural-born citizen clause precedent was pretty damned important. Ahem. Wouldn't you agree?

Anonymous said...

Rodger, following up on my first post I'd agree that "editing" Justia raises some interesting questions. Most importantly, why would someone bother doing that when they can't modify Lexis? [Whether those modifications are actually "criminal" is a separate question. Unethical definitely. Illegal? Who knows. Depends who did it and what sort of authorizations they did or did not have.
.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Okay, that sounds "legal" - I'm not selling anything here, so it is whatever it is. Just like every other little thing "Obama", taken as a whole.

Anonymous said...

The O was born. That's natural. Therefore, he's a citizen.
U.K.L. Lee

Anonymous said...

A search on justia.com for "memory hole" - in the Orwellian sense obviously, does not pop up it's own use of the memory hole.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Apparently the motivation was to keep internet sleuths from accessing "Minor v. Happersett."

My money is on Moveon.org or, most prolly, KOS (who introduced the first fraudulent COLB).

leelu said...

...this is why we have "hard copy". Many of them. So the bastards have to hunt them down and fight for them before they burn them.

Hopefully, they'll be killed in the fight before there a burning.

T/W: sable ...somehow seems appropriate.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.