Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Gee - Syria has chemical WMDs. Go figure.



'Flagrantly Dishonest'

Underscoring once again that Democrats are not fit to lead.  Not because they're terminally stupid, or ignorant— although there is too much of that.  No, they are  unfit to lead because they have time and time again turned their backs to the truth, and to the national interest for rank  political gain. 

 In 2003 virtually every Democrat stated a belief that Saddam had WMDs.  Then of a sudden, in a choreographed dance that would make the Rockettes envious, they changed. Like in a heart-beat. Began sneering at the administration's effort to gain support to invade Iraq in order to disarm that mad man.. 

Because they were careless with a memo— not that we needed it— we know to a certainty why the sudden shift.  Beating Bush in 2004.  A warmongering cowboy out for revenge would be easier pickings than a Dwight Eisenhower.  They undermined the president, our troops, and our country. Again.

Not fit to lead then, because they are scurrilous, treasonous scum.


8 comments:

Darrell said...

I seem to recall that a terrorist use of chemical weapons in Jordan was narrowly averted, shortly after the US took Iraq. It was thought at the time that the chems came from Iraq into the Bekaa valley. The story was quickly buried--didn't fit the narrative, don't ya know.

Anonymous said...

Not fit to lead then, because they are scurrilous, treasonous scum.

That's funny. Especially after the last post.

*spit*

Helly said...

Off-topic: I can't stop thinking about what a wing of A-10s could do to that line of trucks.

Anonymous said...

"SHOULD HAVE DONE" to those trucks is more like it. And, it's very much on topic as far as I'm concerned.

Quote from the linked article: "at the very least some heads ought to roll. A good place to start would be minority staff director Christopher Mellon".

Can somebody tell me why these sumbitches even have staff? Most business people maybe have a secretary (OK, "executive assistant"), and beyond that, department heads who are actually making things happen and generating income.

These pampered princes have way too much help leaving them with far too much time on their hands for mischief.

Sir H the (evidently ignorant) Comet

TimO said...

Same thing happened when we invaded Iraq; every Iraqi fighter plane that wasn't destroyed or trapped on the ground by our runway busters took off and headed to shelter in Iran (even though a million men had been consumed in the Iran/Iraq War).

A Muslim enemy is still a brother Muslim and preferable to letting a weapon fall into the hands of an infidel....

Anonymous said...

Not every MiG, TimO. Months after the ouster of Saddam we uncovered a MiG buried in the sand just outside of a US base.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/8/6/105528.shtml

... The MiG was dug out of a massive sand dune near the Al Taqqadum airfield by U.S. Air Force recovery teams. The MiG was reportedly one of over two dozen Iraqi jets buried in the sand, like hidden treasure, waiting to be recovered at a later date...

Freddie Sykes

Anonymous said...

Q: What do you call a liberal who wears too much perfume?
A: Fragrantly Dishonest
GrinfilledCelt

Firehand said...

One of the things I'm still ticked at Bush about: he was so busy with "We have to get the UN on board, etc." that he didn't order the strikes he should have on that mess.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.