Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Liberty's Torch



A Different View
Liberty's Torch
  • You cannot vote the Revolution.
  • You cannot buy the Revolution.
  • You can only be the Revolution.
  • If the torch of freedom doesn't burn in your heart, it is nowhere.

Res Ipsa Loquitor
**Adam Smith (Milton Friedman' Sr.) was a Classical Liberal. 

This illustration is a whole education in political economy in a few thousand pixels.

The annotations are significant, but even more so is the geometry through which they're depicted: an expanding sphere of State control, first over our necessities, then over our discretionary activities, and ultimately over the whole of human existence. At each stage, the State's coercive powers are amplified by the importance and scope of the resources it appropriated in the previous stage, such that individuals and voluntary organizations steadily lose all power to resist its further expansion. The Blob wouldn't have had a chance against the State.

I can add only a single observation to this depiction: As the State swells, it ceases to perform any of its functions even marginally well. Indeed, the first functions it will slough are the ones for which we originally agreed to tolerate a pre-indemnified coercive authority: national defense, police protection, and the administration of impartial justice. In the terminal stage of its expansion, when it lays claim to all things and no one outside its corridors may do anything without first asking its permission and paying its price, the State's sole concern becomes the maintenance of its power and the perquisites of its nomenklatura.

This is likely to be a rather hectic day for me, so I doubt I'll be posting anything further until tomorrow. Therefore I urge you one and all, Gentle Readers, to reflect upon the above, and to ask yourselves:

This "anarchy" the State's boosters are always warning me against: Just how bad would it be?

Francis W. Porretto - bastionofliberty.blogspot.com/

Great catch by Harold M

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

From the genius of Ayn Rand.

"Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society’s virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing — when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors — when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice — you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot."

Tim

Anonymous said...

How bad is anarchy? It depends which end of the rope you're on. The founders weren't great because they had first-mover advantage. They were great because they risked everything to do what needed to be done.

Casca

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Nail on head Casca.

Tom Mann said...

"The Blob wouldn't have had a chance against the State."

The State is the Blob."

Anonymous said...

From Oleg Volk, commenting on the diagram:

Instead of "government-provided" it should read "government-controlled" -- North Korean and Cuban governments aren't providing much except to a very narrow group of essentially feudal overlords.

iri said...

"The founders weren't great because they had first-mover advantage."

Correct! They had First Mover advantage. Something we ain't got. What left of us is Shiloh. You get the government or lack of government you deserve I always say. Ted Cruz gets it, I think.

Anonymous said...

Well I think 47% of the country is getting shafted on the government they deserve.

Josh

iri said...

100% of the country Josh unless you think in the end the Obama voters are actually going to improve their lot. We're all in the same boat don't you know? The difference is those people you mention in passing are not smart enough to figure it out. We used to weed out the dummies and not give them the privilege to vote. Now look'it what we got voting. Get it?

Anonymous said...

I think we're saying two different things. The Obamazombies "deserve" the government they have. Short term gain "atleast for the welfare leech" for long term disaster of the country. I'm saying those who aren't with him, aren't complicit in his agenda (the voting public not in support of Obama) are getting shafted. They (we) of this blog, of the country who aren't with him, certainly don't deserve the government we're getting now.

That's what I was trying to say. I think I read incorrectly into what you were saying.

Tony Neville said...

I know someone who once called himself an anarchist. After getting chucked out of the air-force for smoking pot he lived off the taxpayer for years while resenting society as a whole and, of course, voted for the biggest statist crapbag around. It's the sort of anarchist who thinks the Communist sympathizing rock group, Rage Against the Machine, is just so kewl...

Real anarchists are all anarcho-capitalists. I have no respect of left-wing anarchists and next to no respect for anarcho-capitalists. The idea of having competing justice systems is ludicrous. People won't necessarily have the freedom to opt out of *any* justice system. I'm content with classical liberalism, but a minarchist world is my ideal.

iri said...

"I think I read incorrectly into what you were saying."

Yep, maybe a little Josh. It's not easy to say or explain how even the best of us in our own way (because of our ways) have reaped what we have sown.

Francis W. Porretto said...

Tony, we already have competing justice systems, both domestically and internationally. The results aren't terrific, but you can't claim that the problem is that they're in competition with one another when, in a world of semicooperating sovereignties, there's no alternative arrangement.

A very illuminating book on the subject was penned some years ago by Pacific Institute scholar Bruce Benson: The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without The State. It's not a conclusive argument, but it is full of good history and examples, even in the modern world, of Stateless judicial and penal systems that have something to say for themselves.

Tony Neville said...

What alternative arrangement could anarcho-capitalists possibly offer other than more of the same domestically? They are in effect arguing for the status quo to be applied domestically and the status quo is broken. Why not just fight for what is demonstrably just or are they all subjectivists?

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.