Progressive
politics is rooted in racism. Look carefully at most social or fiscal
policies advocated by progressives and you’ll see that underneath their
false public rationales lie hidden racist fears and assumptions — some
of which the progressives may be too embarrassed to admit even to
themselves, much less to the world.
Viewed
globally, the real long-term consequence of all the “climate
change”-related policy proposals is to transfer massive amounts of
wealth from the First World developed nations to the Third World
underdeveloped nations, while simultaneously crippling the ability of
the developed world to maintain its economic dominance.
What could motivate this seemingly suicidal economic policy by
First-World progressives? In a word: Guilt. Specifically, “white guilt”
This
essay will likely be eye-opening for conservatives, and infuriating for
progressives, who often don’t
know their own history and
never contemplated the origins of their own belief system. But it’s
time to finally bring the uncomfortable truth out in the open.
Below
you will find eight separate entries, each focusing on a different
policy pushed by progressives. Each entry follows the same format:
BOLD: Name of topic.
In
yellow: A
neutral description of the exact proposal which progressives champion.
In
red: The
progressives’ stated justification or explanation behind their
position, which hides their real purpose.
In
red: The
inaccurate theory which conservatives mistakenly assume must be the
actual progressive motivation.
In
green: The
true racist reason underlying the progressive policy.
Plain text: Additional notes on the origins of the progressives’ racist
attitude and how it led to this specific policy proposal.
GUN
CONTROL
- Progressive
position:
- Restrict access to guns as much as
possible; ultimately ban and confiscate them all.
- False
public rationale offered by progressives to justify their position:
- Gun violence is a scourge on society; easy
access to killing machines unnecessarily facilitates murder and crime.
- Conservatives’
inaccurate theory of progressives’ real intent:
- Progressives want to disarm
the populace to prevent armed resistance to the eventual imposition of
a leftist totalitarian police state.
- The actual racist origins of the
progressive stance:
- White urban liberals are
deathly afraid of black gangbangers with guns, but are ashamed to admit
this publicly, so to mask their racist fears they try to ban guns
for everyone, as a way of warding off the perception that their
real goal is to target blacks specifically.
|
The basic dividing line in American politics is
not (as
it once was ) North vs. South, nor is it (as many people now assume)
Coasts vs. Flyover Country, but rather Urban
vs. Rural:
The
new political divide is a stark division between cities and what
remains of the countryside. Not just some cities and some rural areas,
either — virtually every major city (100,000-plus population) in the
United States of America has a different outlook from the less populous
areas that are closest to it. The difference is no longer about where
people live, it’s about how people live: in spread-out, open,
low-density privacy — or amid rough-and-tumble, in-your-face population
density and diverse communities that enforce a lower-common denominator
of tolerance among inhabitants. …The only major cities that voted
Republican in the 2012 presidential election were Phoenix, Oklahoma
City, Fort Worth, and Salt Lake City.
Or
put more simply: In modern America, liberals live in cities;
conservatives live in rural areas. And what else is concentrated in
cities? African-Americans,
and gun
violence:
The
62 center cities of America’s 50 largest metro areas account for 15
percent of the population but 39 percent of gun-related murders.
Putting
all these statistics together, we see that large cities have high
concentrations of white liberals alongsidegun-using black
criminals.
And yet it is specifically in Democrat-voting big cities where most of
the gun-control measures are proposed. Why is that? Are the white
progressive urban dwellers afraid of rootin’-tootin’ cowboys? Of
backwoods deer hunters? Of hillbillies with shotguns? No: the average
white progressive has never even met a cowboy, a hunter or a hillbilly.
And frankly, progressives couldn’t care less if rednecks own guns,
because progressives aren’t physically afraid of rednecks on a daily
basis. Instead, they are afraid of gun violence at the hands of their
fellow city-dwellers, the urban African-Americans who commit a wildly
disproportionate percentage of the gun crimes in America.
Progressives
don’t want to ban guns to disarm resistance to any upcoming police
state; that idea has never even occurred to them. Instead, progressives
want to ban guns because progressives are afraid of black people.
But
God forbid that progressives’ racist motivations be exposed publicly.
So to make the gun-control bans appear even-handed and race-neutral,
progressives must try to ban guns for everyone, even though the
bans
are in reality aimed at one specific group. Rural gun-users are just
collateral damage of a policy that actually targets inner-city blacks.
- JUNK FOOD TAXES
- Progressive
position: [Full Article]
