Friday, October 02, 2015

A yuck and a YUCK

Two Things
John Effing Kerry

John Effing Kerry

Or, Today's Pompous Putz

Todays Gratuitous PHOTOSNOT
John Effing Kerry
John Effing Kerry

Just because ...

Selling US


Half a century ago, Democrats looked at the country and realized they were never going to convince Americans to agree with them. But they noticed that people in most other countries of the world already agreed with them. The solution was obvious.

So in 1965 -- 50 years ago this week -- Sen. Ted Kennedy passed an immigration law that has brought 59 million foreigners (Ed:non European) to our shores, who happen to vote 8-2 for the Democrats.

Democrats haven't won any arguments; they changed the voters. If anything, the Democrats have stopped bothering to appeal to Americans. The new feminized Democratic Party says, That's too bad about those steelworkers in Ohio losing their jobs, but THERE'S A WOMAN AT A LAW FIRM IN NEW YORK CITY WHO DESERVES TO MAKE PARTNER!

Democratic political strategists Ruy Teixeira and John Judis have been gloating for 20 years about how post-1965 immigration would soon produce a country where Republicans could not win an election, anywhere. Then Democrats could do whatever they want. They called the new emerging majority "George McGovern's Revenge."
Republicans should be sweeping the country, but they aren't, because of Kennedy's immigration law. Without post-1965 immigrants bloc-voting for the Democrats, Obama never would have been elected president, and Romney would have won a bigger landslide against him in 2012 than Reagan did against Carter in 1980.

This isn't a guess; it's a provable fact. Obama beat Romney by less than 5 million votes in a presidential election in which about 125 million votes were cast. More than 30 million of Obama's votes came from people who arrived under Teddy Kennedy's immigration law; fewer than 10 million of Romney's did.

The 1965 act brought in the poorest of the poor from around the globe. Non-English-speaking peasants from wildly backward cultures could be counted on to be dependent on government assistance for generations to come.

Kennedy and other Democrats swore up and down that the new immigration law would not change the country's demographics, but post-1965-act immigrants are nothing like the people who already lived here.

As Pew Research cheerfully reports, previous immigrants were "almost entirely" European. But since Kennedy's immigration act, a majority of immigrants have been from Latin America. One-quarter are from Asia. Only 12 percent of post-1965-act immigrants have been from Europe -- and they're probably Muslims.

Read More


Gender Change?

Gee Dad - It's a Muslum

Next- "The Walk of Shame"

Res Ipsa Loquitur                    A HAPPY GIRLS  ... Erm


A Very Sharp Shooter

Res Ipsa Loquitur                    A HAPPY GIRL SHARES HER HAPPY

Tommy Lee Smith

BOOK MARK - Our Crappy Culture

    Liberal Culture                   

“Non-Negotiable: Essential Principles of a Just Society and Humane Culture.”

Author Shelia Liaugminas looks beyond politics and the theory of cultural relativism to get at the heart of what is truly “Non-Negotiable: Essential Principles of a Just Society and Humane Culture.” Hosted by Doug Keck.
"... global culture frankly is so distorted now that when we have words like "choice" covering abortion--when it's really not about choice but that's what they've made it about all these decades.

And the word "equality" has come to be the mantle for the, the movement to redefine marriage in law. And the word compassion"-- which, we are compassionate people, is the mantle for the Euthanasia Movement. Our language is so distorted that we don't know how to talk to each other anymore. Even though we're using the same language.  We aren't, we really aren't.

Normally when I see phrases like "Just Society and Humane Culture," my peter shrinks.  What a thrill to see words restored to their original meaning (I did not watch the whole video yet, but will.)

Nobel Clown Awards

a major award                                                 

Nobel Peace Prize controversies often reach beyond the academic community. Criticism that have been levelled against some of the awards include allegations that they were politically motivated (Wikpedia)

  • The 2009 prize went to Barack Obama "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples". The award, given nine months into Obama's presidency;  receiving criticism that it was undeserved, premature and politically motivated.
  • The 2007 prize went to Al Gore and the IPCC, "for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change". 
  • The 2002 prize was awarded to Jimmy Carter for "decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development."
  • The 1994 prize went to Yasser Arafat ...  groups under Arafat's direct or indirect command – including Fatah, Black September, Tanzim and Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade – were responsible for hundreds of bombings, hijackings, assassinations and other attacks, including the 1972 murder of 11 of Israel's Olympic athletes in Munich, the 1973 murder of the American ambassador to Sudan, Cleo Noel, and the 1985 hijacking of the Achille Lauro cruiseship (resulting in the murder of wheelchair-bound Leon Klinghoffer).
  • The 1992 prize was awarded to Rigoberta MenchĂș for "her work for social justice and ethno-cultural reconciliation based on respect for the rights of indigenous peoples". The prize-winner's memoirs, which had brought her to fame, turned out to be partly fictitious.
Kerry fits right in, wot?