Thursday, August 04, 2016

We have met the enemy


We have met the enemy and it's them

  • There were virtually no Muslims in America before Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration act.
  • Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than from Great Britain.
  • We've admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had been admitted before 9/11.
  • Speaker Paul Ryan proclaimed: "That's not who we are."
  • Jeb! Bush made the subtle and clever argument that Trump was "unhinged."
  • Marco Rubio called any pause in Muslim immigration "offensive."
  • Does anyone know what Khan thinks of gays? How about miniskirts? Alcohol? ...
  • Have any current members of The New York Times editorial board ever lost a son in war? (Fighting on the American side.)
In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.

Khan's argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that "our" Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.

If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year -- as we do -- we'd already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn't have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the "argument" part of Khan's point is gibberish.

Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can't say anything.

Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan's son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's why we're obligated to import yet more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed his son. Q.E.D.! [FULL]

Sinecure - a position requiring little or no work but giving the holder status or financial benefit.

'nuff said.


Anonymous said...

Last I saw, Chelsea "silver spoon" wasn't wearing any uniform. -Anymouse

Helly said...

The more we learn about this Khan freak, the stinkier it gets. Though there are some useful generalizations he illustrates.

1. When you lose a beloved family member, you have to accept he is gone. So there is no reason to decline cash compensaion for exploiting the lose.

2. Dems believe that anybody anywhere in the world has the right to be a replacement voter for Democrats in America. You really can't blame them for this, because they kill off so many of their voters each year with malnutrition, drugs, abortion, and shootings.

3. Dems have no useful ideas to inspire voting, so it's always about personality cults. Therefore, recruiting voters inured to monarchal and fascist governance yields best results for them.

4. Educated Asian/African immigrants love bribable politicians. Getting government officials to accept your gratuities is the sure path to business success and upward social mobility.

Anonymous said...

approach would make for a great comeback
in a Trump ad.

Ask Kahn if he's read the quran and offer him a copy,
to remind him of the commands to violent the one which got his son killed.

Anonymous said...

I think Helly must be living with the now great Khan, she nailed him so well, esp the bit about buying access. It's the way of life where they came from.
BTW, a bunch of deep pocket Dems have created a fund for Khan to run for the Virginia legislature.
Hmmph. Another fucking Clinton come-here cancer cell metastasizes.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick

David aka True Blue Sam said...

Fourteen Muslim servicemen killed in our wars; how many U.S servicemen and women killed by Muslim servicemen and contractors who went on a sudden Jihad?

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.