Curmudgeonly & Skeptical presents Boned Jello: "Giglet Ablation" works.

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

"Giglet Ablation" works.

A top New York Times editor decided the paper shouldn’t use the term “female genital mutilation” because the phrase is too “culturally loaded” and widens a divide between the Western world and “people who follow the rite.”

Rodger the Real King of France 4/25/2017 12:04:00 AM 8 Comments

"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. "
Argus Hamilton

8 comments:

toadold said...: All the declared male gender at the NYT, in the interest of equal treatment, should have their penises removed......film at 11.; 4/25/17, 2:22 AM
Anonymous said...: In the same spirit of negro leading to black leading to african american...
FGM leading to genital cutting will most certainly eventually lead to
CLIT LIBERATION.; 4/25/17, 6:01 AM
cato said...: That is also the reason the NYT doesn't call the murder, kidnapping, rape, torture and crucifixion of 100s of thousands of middle east Christians, genocide.
It's just islamic cultural nature.; 4/25/17, 7:11 AM
Unknown said...: This actually serves two agendas. One is the softening of any and all of the uncivilized aspects of the blood cult known as Islam; don't be surprised if beheadings are soon re-designated as "religiously-inspired bloodletting" or some even more benign construct. Think of what's been done with "workplace violence".

The other is to draw a false equivalency between FGM and male circumcision. They already tried this by calling FGM "female circumcision", when it is clearly not that, but clitoridectomy. This false equivalency allows either the justification of FGM as a religious rite, or, if FGM is to be condemned, male circumcision can be condemned under the same umbrella.

And why would male circumcision be condemned? Well, what group originated it? That's right, Da Joos!

And for those who say, "Wait a minute! Lots of people other than Jews have their male babies circumcised!", the propagandists already have an answer: "It's because Da Joos control the medical establishment, just as they control everything else!"; 4/25/17, 9:44 AM
renojim said...: The NYT will soon come to the point where they can't say anything at all, and the rest of us will be better off.; 4/25/17, 10:02 AM
Skoonj said...: It was the NYT editor that was loaded.; 4/25/17, 11:35 AM
Esteve said...: "Involuntary female child butchery" is a viable option. But wait, that sounds too much like abortion.; 4/25/17, 3:23 PM
Anonymous said...: The words don't "widen the divide" between us and barbarism, what the words describe does. What appalling stupidity.
Luigi; 4/25/17, 5:05 PM

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

"Giglet Ablation" works.

8 comments:

Post a Comment