Friday, February 08, 2019

What we have here is a budding Earl Warren

On the day of the ruling in June 2012, Chris Cillizza, then writing for The Washington Post, claimed that Roberts’ opinion “made good on his pledge to referee the game, not play it.” But the story Biskupic tells, which confirms prior reporting by Jan Crawford published shortly after the ruling, contradicts Cillizza’s view entirely. Roberts’ entire approach to the case consisted of playing games—and highly political ones at that [FULL].


Skoonj said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Another fine mess the Bush(s) have gotten us into. Not sorry Jeb! Escaped that as well as Hillashrew. MAGA

Rodger the Real King of France said...

The bush family are DEEPers

Steve in Greensboro said...

John "Souter" Roberts

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.