Friday, January 27, 2006

Fun with the Julius and Ethel Fan Club

Face it, we'll have to club 'em.
Not all insane people are hard core liberals, but all hard core liberals are insane.  Accepting that thesis will help us understand the intractable nature of  the Kerrys, Gores, and Howard Deans of this world, who, even when presented with hard truths, refuse to entertain them.  Here is one such recent festival of  pod people.

Rosenberg Reruns:
A Cause the Left Can't Give Up

You would think, by now, with a half-century of scholarship behind us and a great deal of damning evidence on display, we would not have to be arguing about the guilt or innocence of various iconic figures of the late 1940s and 1950s: Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White or, perhaps most notoriously, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. But the martyr-status of such figures seems irresistible, even today, to a certain kind of sentimental leftist. They still remain symbols of some malevolent American quality -- never mind the truth of what they actually did.

Such was the lesson of a forum last week in Manhattan convened to discuss the "artistic influence" of the Rosenbergs. The invitation to the event, sponsored by the Fordham Law School, referred to the Rosenbergs as "the accused." It was a tellingly exculpatory phrase. For the record, both Julius and Ethel were convicted as communist spies and executed for espionage in 1953.

The stars of the evening were the novelist E.L. Doctorow and the playwright Tony Kushner.
I really hate posting long tracts, because I don't have the attention span myself to read them.   I can't help myself here.
Mr. Kushner argued the Rosenbergs were "murdered, basically." Mr. Doctorow went further, explaining that he wanted to use their circumstances to tell "a story of the mind of the country." It was a mind, apparently, filled with loathing and paranoia -- again, never mind the truth of the charges against the Rosenbergs or other spies of the time. "The principles of the Cold War had reached absurdity," he continued. "We knew that the Russians were no threat, but we wanted to persuade Americans to be afraid" and so impose "a Puritan, punitive civil religion." Pronounced Mr. Kushner: "Our failure to come to terms with a brutal past, our failure to open up the coffins and let the ghosts out, has led to our current, horrendous situation."
"We knew that the Russians were no threat ...?"  The problem, of course, is that this version of recent history is being taught to your children.  And, you're working two jobs to pay for it!  JFC!  Anyway, here's the last thing I'll paste (if any of you want the full article [Rosenberg Reruns: A Cause the Left Can't Give Up] , E-mail me and I'll send it.
As the artists turned the Rosenbergs' treason into dissent and then into patriotism, the audience was enthusiastically in tune. Present were the Rosenbergs' children, Robert and Michael Meeropol, who continue to contest their parents' Soviet entanglement, and the former editor of the Nation, Victor Navasky. When it came time to ask questions, the moderator warned off any "Cold War warriors" from asking "disrespectful" questions, like, presumably, how these authors could defend an ideology that took millions of lives. No one did.

1 comment:

Jake said...

This is what the Rosenbergs gave the world:

Once the Russians received the secrets from the Rosenbergs, they began their atom bomb program. Stalin used slave labor to process uranium for the atom bomb. The Russians used no shielding or other measures to protect the slaves from radiation in the uranium processing factories.

Factory scientists had calculated to the day when a slave would no longer be able to work because of radiation sickness. The day before the slave's last day of work, the Russians would stop feeding the slave.

It was then a race to see what would kill the slave first-starvation or radiation sickness.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.