Monday, February 27, 2006

Time to Bully
It' s not unusual for even great leaders to go catatonic at critical times.  Who knows what might have happened had Lincoln made public appearances after his election in 1860, and tried to assure Southerners that the world was not going to end because he was President.  Instead, he simply disappeared, from November through March, when he sneaked into Washington for his Inauguration.  It was too late.  Gen. MacArthur similarly went into a months long shell after being rescued by submarine from the Philippines.  Both snapped back, and their legacies as great leaders are chiseled in rock.  Maybe President Bush will do the same?

Here [Have We Lost in Iraq?] `Jed Babbin writes what many of us feel ..
''Failure in Iraq is within our grasp, but success now seems out of reach. It lies ahead, somewhere, in a fog of war, religion, and ideology. The visions of success created by a hugely successful military campaign and the apparent birth of democracy -- three elections, millions of Iraqis risking all to stain their thumbs purple -- were a mirage. The mirage of success wasn't reality because we -- meaning the president -- never defined success. He never spoke plainly to us about the ugliness of reality, which precludes success in Iraq unless and until the defeat of its terrorist-sponsoring neighbors occurred. ''
Babbin writes that ''the persistent intervention of Iraq's neighbors who want anything but democracy on their borders,'' is manifest in the current attempt to drive that nation to civil war.  He might also have mentioned that ''the persistent intervention of Democrats who want anything but a Bush success'' have played an important, and dividing role. 
''Is the President so oblivious  to events that he doesn't understand that he has set Americans adrift in an ocean of hostile media, leaving the formation of public opinion to the New York Times, CBS, the BBC and Alec Baldwin? ''
Bush had better begin emulating FDR more, and LBJ less.  This deal so closely follows the leftist Vietnam script, that the only thing left is a campus massacre by National Guardsmen (I have suggestions). If  I'm  the President, I address the nation, and make it clear that, while Iraqi democracy might be a nice thing, it's not critical to our success. ''If we must, we'll turn the entire Middle East into one huge Exxon station."  Or something.  But get mad, and get mad in public.  Be firm and be firm in public.  Define the mission, including Iran and Syria, and do it in public.  We'll know he's succeeded when Alec Baldwin goes into hiding from the lynch mobs. 

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

mmm, interesting...

but for me, Bush has push the NYTimes, CBS, BBC, Baldwin-Franken-Moore over the edge, revealing their insane unethical existence to more Americans.

Sorry, I enjoyed Babbin's conjecture, but also see him as another leaning towards being wimpy.

VDH is perhaps an objective counter, seeing as he just visited Iraq personally:

February 24, 2006, 6:29 a.m.
Standoff in Iraq
The IED vs. Democracy. / Victor D. Hanson

http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.p?ref=/hanson/hanson200602240629.asp

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.