38 for 39

"Your argument makes no sense," U.S. Circuit Judge Harry T. Edwards told the lawyer for the Federal Communications Commission, Jacob Lewis. "When you go back to the office, have a big chuckle. I'm not missing this. This is ridiculous. Counsel!" - Judge: Wiretap Rules 'Gobbledygook' I don't know the details of this case, it's merits, or whose side I'm on.  I do know this judge has the trademark Liberal smack down pretty good.   Okay, I might be biased, just a little, because it's a given that when it comes to national security issues, Liberals always side with our enemies, but mostly it was the tone and tenor I picked up on this time.  We haven't played ''Who Named That Rotten Judge'' in a while, so let's do.  For noobs, my premise is that whenever a decision is handed down that offends common sense, or is contrary to the law, as us commoners understand it,  the judge involved was placed on the court by Carter or Clinton.  I think I'm something like 37 for 38 so far. This time I say -- I'll say  --- Clinton.  Your turn. ANSWER The real significance of this exercise is that we can usually identify the politics of judges today by the smell of their judicial farts.  Not  good.