Inspector Jack showed me this Powerline
report, and I have to reprint it in its entirety. Any nation that will return this collection of Nimrods to power deserves misfortune.
“ |
Over
Republican objections, the House Democrats have managed to pass
legislation that will require our intelligence community to provide an
assessment of the security threat posed by global warming. Within 270
days after the bill becomes law, the Direactor of National Intelligence
will be required to submit to Congress a National Intelligence Estimate
that assesses among other things, "the political, social, agricultural
and economic risks during the next 30 years posed by global climate
change for countries or regions of strategic importance to the U.S. and
for countires that are at significant risk of large-scale humanitarian
suffering due to global climate change.
Our
intelligence community has found it difficult enough to assess things
that ought to be within its area of expertise -- what kinds of weapons
our enemies have or soon will have, the extent of the threat posed by
terrorists, etc. Now the Democrats want it to divert resources away
from these critical issues and to speculate about what our climate will
be like in 30 years. But plenty of people are already doing this -- the
federal government alone spends $6.5 billion dollars studying global
climate change.
Rep. Edward Markey defended the legislation on the theory that "global
warming is a major strategic weakness." What he means by this is not
clear. I suppose that if Europe becomes a desert in the next 30 years,
we will need a different mix of weaponry to fight there. But it would
be pretty foolish to attempt 270 days from now to assess what the
global climate will be like in 30 years and to begin changing our
military strategy and procurement accordingly.
This legislation represents little more than Democratic posturing. But
then posturing has long been the defining characteristic of Democratic
strategic "thinking."
| ” |
Are we insane? I think, yes.
|