Saturday, October 20, 2007

Hillary, Beyond Corruption

Silver spike, fire, garlic

Replay video | Share video | Watch more videos
(Thanks Fred)
The candidate's unparalleled fundraising success relies largely on the least-affluent residents of New York's Chinatown -- some of whom can't be tracked down.
As with other campaigns looking for dollars in unpromising places, the Clinton operation also has accepted what it later conceded were improper donations. At least one reported donor denies making a contribution. Another admitted to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money.
*snip*
Although Motyka is wary of the havoc wreaked in the past by Fujianese organized crime, he said: "I welcome signs that the community is participating in politics."
*snip*
Clinton aides said they were concerned about some of the Chinatown contributions. [Full LA TIMES story]

Here's some after dinner snacks

Clinton donor wanted by FBI in scheme to funnel money (No - not the Chinese guy Hsu, another one)

Hillary’s “Crime On Tape” Protected By CA Appellate Court  (No, not the Chinese Guy Hsu,  Peter Paul)



I know what you're saying, "But Rodge, what can we do?"  I'm afraid there's but one course of action at this point.  A sliver spike through her heart, then burned at the stake.  I think there's something about garlic too.

BTW, this dude below does as good a job as I've seen explaining the Peter Paul crime.  Way better than 60 Minutes.  That's because 60 Minutes didn't report on it at all. Barely nobody else in the Drive-By either.  Silver spike, fire, garlic

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh my God!

PARIS -- Hillary Rodham Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for U.S. President, may be called as a material witness in the State of California, in what may be the largest election fraud in U.S. history. All news of this case has been effectively censored in the U.S. mainstream media. Read the full story in The Wall Street Journal, "For Clinton, 2000 Fund-Raising Controversy Lingers".

Hillary may have violated the law by not reporting large contributions to her successful 2000 campaign for U.S. Senator. Mr. Peter F. Paul claims that his contributions were omitted from the public reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, and Hillary denies all knowledge of these contributions. Read the latest ruling in Case B191066, Paul v. Clinton.

Hillary even denies knowing Mr. Paul, a three time convicted felon, who made the contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign. A video, "Hillary Exposed", produced by the Equal Justice Foundation of America has been viewed more than 784,000 times. A case such as this normally ends any aspirations that a politician may have for public office, and certainly raises questions about the illicit fund-raising practices in the Clinton camp.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Did you read the "Hillary’s “Crime On Tape” Protected By CA Appellate Court " link?

The California Appellate ruled against allowing Paul's tape.

Buy ammo.

El Jefe said...

Lots of ammo

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.