Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Israel - Syria - Nukes

Syria's Nuke?

Shachtman  presents a rather compelling argument that the recent Israeli attack on a Syrian installation, widely assumed to be a reactor in the making, was instead an attack on a nuke assembly complex.  If so, we came that close to a nuclear bomb equipped Iran.  The question is, where did Syria get the plutonium?  Saddam?  Baby Kim?  Lybia?  Russia?

Israeli Target: Syrian A-Bomb Plant?
By Noah Shachtman

Maybe the Israelis didn't bomb a nuclear reactor in the Syrian desert, last September.  Maybe they blew up a factory for assembling a plutonium bomb, instead.  That's the theory from Tel Aviv University Professor Uzi Even -- a former left-wing member of Israel's parliament and a chemist who worked at the nuclear reactor in Dimona.

For starters, the Syrian facility has been compared to the North Korean nuclear reactor at Yongbyon, Ha'Aretz notes.  But in the reactor in Yongbyon, "one can clearly see a chimney, which is necessary for the emission of the radioactive gases... In the satellite photos of the structure in Syria there is no chimney." [more]

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

... or Pakistan where the architect of the "Muslim Bomb" program outsourced to any believing country is still sitting in "house arrest"...

Anonymous said...

But Rodger, global warming and universal health care are far more important than any "alleged" Islamo nuke threat, aren't they? Besides it's time to withdraw our troops. *wince*

Anonymous said...

Salam....In chi-ye? Ah, this is what I will use to carry my Dunkin Donut purchase.I can carry chahar cake donuts in this manner...Kart-e etebar ghabool milonid?..I have Mastercard.

cmblake6 said...

Hit them. Very, very hard. We can drill through the glass.

Anonymous said...

""one can clearly see a chimney, which is necessary for the emission of the radioactive gases"

WTF??? Wait a second here. I call Bullshit and can say that the whole article is now in question. Nuclear reactors are closed-loop systems. The purpose of the reaction is to heat water, which then spins a turbine after which the pressurized steam runs through a heat exchanger and returns to be heated again and repeat the loop.

The "chimney" is part of the heat exchanger which gives of copious amounts of steam but NO radioactivity is released. (this is why nuclear plants are more efficient in the winter, the heat exchanger is more efficient due to the lower temperatures/greater heat delta.)

If a basic fact such as this has been missed by this so-called "expert", then I can't trust any other part of the interview.
--Jack

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.