For
the past 20 years, the U.N. has operated under a tradition of adopting
budgetary decisions only by consensus. This informal process was
adopted under threat of U.S. financial withholding under the
Kassebaum-Solomon Amendment to the Foreign Relations Authorization Act
for fiscal years 1986 and 1987. At the time, diplomatic efforts were
proving insufficient to arrest the increasing politicization of U.N.
operations and programs and the organization's rapidly increasing
budgets.
The United States and other Western countries had
sought unsuccessfully to hold the U.N. to a zero-growth budget in the
first half of the 1980s. This led former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.
Jeane Kirkpatrick to testify that "[t]he countries which contribute
more than 85 percent of the U.N. budget regularly vote against that
budget, but are unable to prevent its increases because the countries
who pay less than 10 percent of the budget have the votes." [Cut Off the UN continued]
|