Saturday, April 19, 2008

How bad is bad?

MSNBC- Giving CNN a Run for the Title ...




Karl Rove vs. Dan Abrams   [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Karl Rove

April 13, 2008

Mr. Dan Abrams

MSNBC

30 Rockefeller Plaza

New York, N.Y. 10112

Dear Mr. Abrams:

On April 7th, you again devoted a substantial part of your show to the claim of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman that I was behind his prosecution.  Your continued coverage of this issue raises questions about your journalistic standards and those of MSNBC and NBC.  During your broadcast, Mr. Siegelman referred to Ms. Dana Jill Simpson as a “respected Republican political operative,” a reference it seems you accept because of the frequent attention you give her in your broadcasts.

Have you, during your coverage of Ms. Simpson, ever actually looked into her claims?  For example, have you ever asked her what campaigns she worked as “an operative” with me?

And if so, did you check out what she said by calling the candidates who were my clients or their campaign managers to ask if she was involved in those campaigns? Did you review campaign expenditure reports to .... continued.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Rove, you magnificent bastard!

- Mainframe

Juice said...

Ditto Mainframe. Of course press members no longer "press" for facts. They are "reporters". They repeat the stories. Ah, but Rove said it best.

Anonymous said...

I don't make it a habit to give money to politicians, but a Cheney-Rove ticket? I'd offer a coin.

rico567 said...

This letter does a good job of pointing to the disease as it is manifested in the media, but the media does what it does because....it plays, in Peoria as well as everywhere else. How my lifetime could span a World War that saw the United States at the peak of its power, and encompass the unraveling of our political system 60 years later, is beyond my comprehension.

Anonymous said...

No, the media 'thinks it will pay' but some how they seem to avoid noting the falling subscriber numbers or their own shrinking staffs. Most people do not read newspapers anymore. More and more people are getting their news from non-traditional sources on the intertubes and have forsaken traditional media like TV or Newpaper. The NYT has lost at least ten percent of the pervious years reader numbers every year for the last decade. And yet they continue doing the same things that ran everyone off; unashamed liberal bias for leftist dictators and candidates and loud unabashed furious HATRED for anything even remotely conservative or libertarian. Few people like a band for long that only plays one song.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.