Friday, June 06, 2008

Firefox Portable




If you buy a new Windows Vista PC, it comes with a decent built-in Web browser, Internet Explorer 7. If you buy a new Macintosh computer, it comes with a decent built-in Web browser, Safari 3.0. So why would you want or need a different Web browser?
WSJ's Walt Mossberg reviews the new version of Firefox Web browser, noting its speed, new features and security.

That is the question that Mozilla, the nonprofit organization that makes the leading alternative browser, hopes to answer this month when it releases version 3.0 of its Firefox Web browser. In some tech-industry circles, Firefox already is preferred over Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Apple's Safari, but it still isn't used by most people, and Mozilla is hoping to broaden its appeal. [continue WSJ Story]


I've been using Firefox Portable 3.0 for three weeks now.  I can't detect any difference, save it's size which is tiny.  You can load and carry the whole thing on a 1GB Flash drive.  Portable Edition, it leaves no personal information behind on the machine you run it on, so you can take your favorite browser along with all your favorite bookmarks and extensions with you wherever you go. And since it doesn't use the Windows registry, it would appear to have the same invulnerability to hacking as do Mac programs?

 I'm using every extension I previously used.  The thing is so good, I'm waiting for a show to drop, and this is still a pre-release version. Wait, there is one problem.  I can't find a way to make it my default browser, so Firefox II will still open as a default. I just discovered the Portable Thunderbird e-mail program that has the same features.  Cowabunga!

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Article seems to indicate that IE7 is the latest thing from Windows.....I recently installed IE8.....??....Have I been time traveling again?

Anonymous said...

You might want to put truecrypt on that thumbdrive as well.

Anonymous said...

What I want to know is who's ponging who?

alwaysFresh,neverFrozen

Rodger the Real King of France said...

That picture of obvious siblings always sends, uh ... difficult images raging through my brainage system.

Bob Hawkins said...

I've been using the beta of FireFox 3, and it's fine. Faster than 2.X, which was already good enough. I'll have to look into the portable version, I've been using OperaUSB.

BTW, I had a Radio Shack Color Computer as pictured. It was a great little computer in some ways, and sucked horribly in others. When I was trying to interpret 132-character-wide printouts on the CoCo's 32-character-wide display, it sucked horribly.

Anonymous said...

Lets see. Flashbacks. Timex Sinclair 1000. Trash 80. Xerox 860 (Word processor). Or my first love, my trusty 8088.
Tim

Anonymous said...

You can load and carry the whole thing on a 1GB Flash drive.

And I would call that HUGE.

Guess I am old school, I remember being able to fit several programs on a 180k 5 1/4 floppy.

LifeTrek said...

I had the beta version and it eliminated the memory issues on all versions but then it did its upgrade to the current version and the memory problem came back. I had to delete version 2 and reinstall fresh. Not sure why, but now my version 3 still has the memory issue even after reinstalling it.
DKK

Rodger the Real King of France said...

DKK - I've had the same memory experience, and have reported it to Mozilla, along with a few other things, like linked text colors in yellow until a page refresh.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.