|
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
|
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
It gets even sillier when people find out why the Dems say she had him removed, the normal reaction by any sane person is something like: "He refused to fire a loon who threatened to shoot her family members? Hell, I'd pull strings to remove such a moron myself, if I had any to pull."
Even if they do prove that she did it for personal reasons, no one in their right mind would question these reasons.
The dems are gonna tank harder than Dukakis this year ...
Rodger, who you gonna believe? Your lyin' eyes or Dhimmocraps?
Oh.... nevermind ;-)
Someone should tell Arthur Laffer about this.
Casca
Laffer made Liberal heads explode the same way Cheney does now. Kinda like aborigines who see their first airplane.
because conservatives may have more rigid views than liberals
Oh really. Conservatives have more "rigid views" than liberals. Says who?
Teddy Kennedy, Jesse Jackson, and Joseph Stalin don't/didn't have "rigid views"?
It sounds to me like Ol' Shankar Vedantam is trying a out a little of his own "political misinformation" by feeding into people's preexisting views.
You just can't trust these bastards.
I recently received an email forwarded to me by a liberal friend of mine. It purported to show various "lies" by Sarah Palin during her convention speech and giving the "facts". I read it over and wrote him back:
"Is this a joke? Did you even read this? Even if I accept your 'facts' as such, not one of them disproves anything Sarah said." All his "facts" did was introduce irrelevancies. For example: Sarah: "I sent the cash back to DC for the Bridge to Nowhere." Facts: "She lobbied for it, then sent the money back to DC." Therefore she lied? My friend thinks so. They were all like that.
So tell me again, who are the ones who won't be persuaded by facts? Who are the ones who can't be reasoned with?
GrinfilledCelt