How
disappointing. I never once thought of juxtaposing "trickle-down"
economics with "trickle-up," but what a wonderful metaphor. But,
horry clap! The left have adopted that chimera as a new economic
cornerstone!
|
“
|
Whenever
I hear anyone use the expression, "trickle-down economics," I want to
reply — though I rarely get the chance to, as it is mainly on TV or in
the papers that one hears or reads the people who are using it — "As
opposed to what? Trickle-up economics?" I had thought up until recently
that this would be, if I had ever got to use it in conversation, a
pretty devastating rejoinder, since — pardon me for pointing out what I
had also thought to be pretty obvious — things that trickle only ever
trickle in the downwards direction. You may not like it, but they do.
It’s a well-known fact. To trickle up they would have to defy the laws
of gravity. As an old joke puts it, you only need to know two things to
be a plumber. They are (1) s*** runs downhill, and (2) payday’s on
Friday.
But ...
Headlines in both the Washington Post and The New York Times refer
to the big Wall Street bailout by the federal government in terms of
"trickling up" while on the progressive website Alternet Joshua Holland writes on "Trickle-Up: What a Progressive Bailout Would Look Like."
Imagine
for a moment that we lived in a country with good, progressive
governance. We wouldn’t find ourselves in our current pickle, but if we
did, what might a real bailout plan based on just a little bit of
economic justice look like? In short, it would be based on trickle-up
economics. We’d bail out homeowners whose mortgages are on the bubble,
and by doing so, the cash we were injecting into the economy would
trickle up to ailing financial institutions.
(James Bowman - continued)
|
” |
|