|
Chuck? |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
|
Chuck? |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
Governmental Immunity:
http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/governmental-immunity-lawyers.html
As for journalists, I used to be one (radio business news) and I know the type... they'll just walk away from the mess, wiping their hands, whistling and happy with themselves for the ratings they'll get while the cities burn.... just like they did in the 1960s.
Congress: where negligence, misfeasance, malfeasance, and criminal disregard ain't flaws, they're features.
-DougM
You mean to actually sue people? I thought darkening the inside of a courtroom was verboten to many of the frequenters of this website.
Can you sue the federal government and its minions under the Federal Torts Claims Act? Yeah. Will you probably win? No. It will probably get tossed out on summary judgment.
You can't make a claim for "damages caused by the fiscal operations of the Treasury or by the regulation of the monetary system."
You also can't make a claim "based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not such statute or regulation be valid. "
Here's the big kicker -- you can't make a claim "based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused. "
The first amendment gives broad protections for anyone to say just about anything. Unless Katie Couric said on the six o'clock news, "Go burn the nearest Republican's house right now!" or Tom Joyner said on his radio program "Kill a blue-eyed devil right now!", there's not much basis for a lawsuit.
One suggestion. Take a look at your homeowner's policy. Make sure you are covered in case of riot, war or civil insurrection. A lot of insurance polices exclude those events.
People hate lawyers until they need one.
Chuck, whiny doesn't become you.
And Chuck, people usually need lawyers only because there are other lawyers.
You're welcome. Glad to be of service.
Rodge: Problem ain't the lawyers ... problem is with the judges.
Competent judges can permanently end the litigation plague.
Incompetent judges perpetuate it.
Even Mandarin style courts ( judge is jury, prosecutor and defending lawyer ) can work if a competent judge is selected.