I haven't seen anything like this
since Vince Foster was found dead at Fort Marcy Park. I'm referring to
the media, and both political parties refusing to question, or even mention the official White House
version of things then, and the current imbroglio over Obama's
citizenship.
|
“
|
BLOGGERS: Real Clear Politics refuses to allow Reader Articles
concerning Barack Obama's citizenship. My latest post reports a
scheduled Supreme Court conference on this very issue. My post was
removed from RCP today. In fact, every post, by most bloggers, covering
Barack Obama's citizenship has been scrubbed from RCP.
Most of
us think what the Supreme Court does is news worthy. Not the case at
RCP. The question is: why does RCP not deem actions by the U.S. Supreme
Court important for readers to know about?
PLEASE, if you have
not posted about this already, grab this and cross-post at your blog.
Let's get the information out and send some letters to the Supreme
Court. [Faultline USA]
Justice Clarence Thomas has placed a discussion of Barack Obama's
citizenship on the December 5th docket for conference, meaning a
discussion of the merit of this particular case.
A commenter at
America's Right, who has been the leading source of excellent
information on the various lawsuits, is requesting that we write
directly to the Supreme Court:
The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas United States Supreme Court One First St. N. E. Washington DC 20543
Put docket # on Envelope 08-A407
Ask him UPHOLD our Constitution with Full Disclosure as the only Constitutionally viable answer.
|
” |
Charles Johnson at LGF goes
berserk over the subject. Honolulu Circuit Court Judge
Bert Ayabe on Wednesday ruled that author
Andy Martin had no standing under state law to obtain a copy of the
birth certificate." That's a bunch of crap, as Mitchell
Langerhans's odyssey [The Plot Thickens: Obama's Birth Certificate and HRS § 338-18] demonstrates. TD Blog reiterates her theory.
|
“
|
Obama’s natural-born status is in question because of his dual
citizenship (more precisely multiple citizenships: British, Kenyan,
Indonesian, US), NOT because of his birth place. That’s why the Donofrio case has the most merit, in our view. Maybe the SCOTUS agrees; maybe not. We’ll soon see.
|
” |
You have to admit that there's
something mysterious going on over what should be a basic clerical
issue. A lot of people, from both political parties, seem to have
a vested interest in plugging this leaky faucet, when all it needs is
the right turn of a handle.
|
|