Thursday, December 11, 2008

Blue Helemts

Mustard on my Bilderburger

With a focus on Greece, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard  discusses coming Euro rioting, as the financial situation there worsens.  It squares with, and compliments,  my own firm belief that barring some miracle, our United States have now been rolled up in global government, of which our own current economic crisis is a planned component, and that we too will see blood on the streets.  Which is not all that bad, depending on whether said blood nourishes the dying roots of the Tree of Liberty, or  merely congeals into a stinking goo. *taking a breath here boss*  In short, will we be led in the near future by a Sarah Palin, or remain in the grips of the  Bush-Clinton complex? 

This comment by someone named Bobsyouruncle resonated.
The internet has allowed the cat out of the bag and people are starting to wake up to the fraudulent nature of the private central banks, their fictitious debt and how politicians(and journalists) are prostituting themselves.

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”[1] James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Company which financed the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the government of Germany.[2] A world government is a world without borders, national sovereignty, constitutions, privacy, autonomy, individual liberties, religious freedoms, private property, the right to bear arms, the rights of marriage and family and a dramatic population reduction (two thirds). A world government establishes a slave/master environment wherein the state controls everything.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Let me get this straight. If the Warburgs were the bankers to the government of Germany, does that mean the government of Germany financed the Russian Revolution during the middle of WWI?

Anonymous said...

DOCUMENTARY 1hr 52min
by Aaron Russo
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173

Anonymous said...

Chuck, it's esoterica, but the krauts transported Lenin to Moscow from Switzerland where he was living in exile. They knew that if they could bring down the Tsar, they could neutralize their Eastern Front, and it worked. The Bolshies signed a seperate peace at Brest-Litovsk, and we and the Brits landed troops in Russia to recapture our war stocks we'd supplied to the Russians. For a wonderful historical treat, give a watch to Reilly Ace of Spies.

Casca

Anonymous said...

Hi Chuck....Here is a very interesting site where I have found hours of enlightening and interesting reading.Lots of (to me)new details regarding USSR, Nazis, and many other subjects.I found a few poinfs that I could disagree with but don't you find that in all writings? ...... http://www.mega.nu/ampp/

Anonymous said...

I used to cause problems at this conspiracy theory site. http://www.threeworldwars.com/forum/ It was full of nut-jobs who thought the Masons, Illuminati, Jews, Zionists, Nazis, Communists, Jesuits, Council on Foreign Relations, Federal Reserve, and Geo. Bush secretly ran the world. My favorite theory was the one where Queen Elizabeth II was a reptilian humanoid hybrid.

I came to the conclusion that most conspiracy theorists are looking for someone to blame for their personal failures.

Anonymous said...

Get the book GLOBAL TYRANNY...STEP BY STEP by William F Jasper written in 1992. Predictions in the book have become more and more evident in the past six months.

I used to dismiss most of this stuff as conspiracy theory, but too much of it is unfolding before our eyes right now at blazing speed.

~down on a muffin~ Pa

Anonymous said...

"Architecture of modern political power" seems to be more a history site than a nutjob one.

SoylentGreen said...

Remember, people... just as with George Soros (or Barack Obama, for that matter), when we say "Germany did this..." or "Russia did that..." these major governments are actually pawns in the hands of powerful individuals who really don't give a damn about the government. In fact they look at the governments as screens and fronts for their powerful plays. I'm with TRKOF... a little bloodshed (which may be coming) could be quite nutritious for the soil of liberty.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

"I came to the conclusion that most conspiracy theorists are looking for someone to blame for their personal failures."

Chuck, I think that's certainly true about the PeTA , Global Warming, etc. cultists, but there are "conspiracies." I submit that Obama is one. The "New World Order," too.

Anonymous said...

I have always said that those who actually take stock in conspiracy theories do so because it is a crutch. The belief in a "They" that controls the fortunes and destinies of men helps to explain away ones own personal failures and shortcomings w/o having to take personal responsibility for those shortcomings and failures. It explains the machinations of the world and ones role in it.

Societies have always done stuff like that. Osirus, Freya, Ganesh, Chalchihuite and scores of other mythological deities have all been used to explain the creation of the world, why it rains, why bad things happen to good people, and everything else in between. They are projections of the human psyche.

In the society of conspiracists, the Bilderbergers, Illuminati, and Trilateral Commission serve the same purpose. They are part of the mythological pantheon of that society. However, the "They" that serve as the pantheon of that society are quite different than the pantheons of other societies.

Pick a culture, any culture -- Sumer, the Celts, Yorba . . . . Those cultures always had forces/mythological deities that were evil. However, they also had at least an equal number (if not more) of forces/mythological deities that were good. The conspiracy society doesn't have that.

In that society, all the forces/mythological deities who control the fates of man are all evil. (Yes, there is also some allegiance to God. However, He is seen as someone who hopefully might come someday and rescue us from the evil that surrounds us.) Each and every one of Them is seen as a Tlazolteotl -- a dark and malevolent force.

And that's why conspiracy theories attract lots of people with psychological problems. People w/ emotional problems already see the whole world as a dark, depressing and fearful place. They then gravitate to a place that "recognizes" that world view and "explains" the same.

They expect to find a pantheon full of Tezcatilpocas to explain their lot in life. They find that mythological pantheon in conspiracy theories.

Anonymous said...

I believe in God, but I also believe in the existence of certain groups and conspiracies.

I believe in the existence of the Bilderbergers, the CFR and the Tri-Lateral Commission.

Whether they constitute a world government conspiracy remains to be seen.

It is certainly peculiar that they take such great pains to meet in secret and that they are only interested in having extremely influential people as members.

I don't blame anyone or any conspiracy on my own lot in life. to the contrary, I consider myself quite blessed.

But I don't think that I am emotionally challenged because I believe that there is a global governance movement afoot which would eviscerate our sovereignty, currency, individual freedoms, etc.

Anonymous said...

Ok, Chuck - I agree, for the most part, on your statement of the psychological nature of those most attracted to conspiracy theories.

Yet.... I still need someone to 'splain to me why the goals & methodologies of the '92 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) are the same as the goals & methodologies of my local planning department -- and yours, if ya look closely?
[see: local General Plan 2020]

e~C

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.