Thursday, June 04, 2009

Bar Talk

O CLUB CHATTER
Pappy GM today has begun its public relations campaign to convince the public that it isn't a dying industry.

By taking out full page ads.

In newspapers.

Savor the irony.



Deacon Blues Afternoon, All. No one bought my house at the auction this morning so now I negotiate with the bank. Another bullet dodged.


Thing From Snowy Mountain MUST

NOT

SNARK...

Blonde therapy lifts spirits in crisis-hit Latvia.




Grunter My wife saw a coyote yesterday, while out walking the dog. Coming out of Riverdale Park, in The Bronx.



OldSpook FYI: if any defender of this crap says "it means the people, not the race" - tell them BULLSH*T. The guy that coined the term used it in a way that supports a racial supremacy angle, to wit:

La Raza, the term, (literally "The Race") originated in the book La Raza Cósmica written by a Mexican writer, José Vasconcelos. He described La Raza Cosmica as the product of racial mixing over time that was already in progress in the Hispanic world. Vasconcelos believed in Supremacismin

And they are discriminatory: Janet Murguía, CEO of the NCLR said at an award ceremony for U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales: "We are going to put our [Latino] people first" - prima facia racial discrimination.

I suggest the following be put to Judge Sotomayor (as put by Congressman Norwood in addressing La Raza and its ties to MeCHA and Atalan and other organizaitons that advoicate racist separatist and irredentist Hispanic activities and sensitivities)


1. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other organizations with which they are now or have ever been associated or funded which held to the racist doctrines published by MEChA.

2. Denounce the statement "For La Raza todo, Fuera de La Raza nada" [“For the [hispanic race] everything, outside the the race, nothing”] as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or citizenship.

3. Repudiate all claims that any current American territory rightfully belongs to Mexico.

4. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they choose in the United States, and that no section or region of this country should be segregated by race or ethnic heritage.

5. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.

6. Seek neutral, third party supervision to ensure that all community and individual assistance programs offered by La Raza and groups supported by La Raza are accessible to all Americans, regardless of race or ethnicity, and that participation in those programs is fully compliant with Equal Opportunity laws.

7. Acknowledge the internationally recognized borders of the United States, the right of the citizens of the United States to determine immigration policy through the democratic process, and the right of the United States to undertake any and all necessary steps including military action to effectively enforce immigration law and defend its borders against unauthorized entry.


Those 7 things must be very clear.


4 comments:

Cuzzin Rick said...

Won't happen

Jacques said...

Wasn't the point of separate states in a union (thus: United States) that each of the states could then decide "minor details" such as a State Religion (not to be decided by a National Authority) that could be decided by the inhabitants of that State? So anyone of the citizens of the United States could move wherever they wanted, provided they decided they wanted to live by THAT State's ideas?
So actually a Hispanic-leaning/respecting/accomodating State (or States) could be completely within the Founders' ideas, it would seem. Not that ALL the States would be obligated to "press 1 for English" or to donate free health care without checking for relative documentation.

leelu said...

Re: items five and six of Old Spook's points... Oh, goody, a new flavor of politically correct. Whilst I agree with the other 5 points, national education plan, uh, no. And, define "neutral". Would that be "our" guy, or "theirs"? Neutral like any judge, right?

Anonymous said...

Thats a huge no on State-by-State religion. The Founders referenced the 30 years war that killed between a third and a half of all Germans. There were over a hundred little states, kingdoms, duchys, margravites, baronys, counties, bishoprics, archbishoprics, electorates, city states, etc, and each one of them had chosen (or had chosen for them) which religion they wanted.

Not at all pretty. Not to mention the other religious wars, crusades, and wars which religion played a large part, plus the political and geostrategic issues which were affected by religion.

The Papacy owned outright much of what is now central Italy, and had its own army and navy, and used it's political as well as religous power for self aggrandizement.

Bad state religion! Bad! Not for America.

Sorry. I'm actually pretty sick, but felt the compulsion to respond. You're lucky I've had my codeine.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.