scream-of-consciousness;
"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Friday, July 17, 2009
Clown Franken X 2
Which Franken is the Klown?
subplot: ratbastard liberal censorship
I
was careful about details while making this video that juxtaposes Al
Franken playing a clown senator at confirmation hearings for two SCOTUS
nominees, because detail was important. At lower bandwidth the
sound sync tends to distort, and everything else gets
fuzzy. I submitted it to YouTube, and within three minutes (no
exaggeration) got this E-mail. In a few days I'll resubmit
it with the title, "Why Obama is right, and the Right is wrong," and
see if it sticks.
“
Your video, Which Franken is Playing a Clown Senator?, may have content that is owned or licensed by NBC Universal.
No action is required on your part; however, if you are interested in
learning how this affects your video, please visit the Content ID
Matches section of your account for more information.
Sincerely,
- The YouTube Team
”
So,
the 60 second clip from SNL is a copyright violation? I guess
that means no more Fair Use of newspaper articles, or snippets of
"Stranded in the Jungle," or Woody Woodpecker? It looks like Waxman
and the Democrats have already chilled the First Amendment, with the
mere threat of controlling internet content. In this instance I'm
able to host it myself (thank you Pay Pal people), albeit not in the glorius Cinerama I
intended. Every day a little more fun is drained from our
lives. Pretty soon we'll all be humorless liberal zombies.
Or Wolverine.
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " Argus Hamilton
Hard to believe this idiotic woman is going to be a SCJOUS for the rest of my life. I don't like admitting it but I kinda tuned out Ginsberg's nomination, suffice for me at the time was 1) she was an ACLU attorney 2) there was a 0% chance she wouldn't get on the SC-since then she is the poster child for making law from the bench-she seems to fabricate law out of thin air. Sotomayer is dumber and has the same MO. Scalia will sit in wonder, no doubt, at one after another of the Mona Lisa of judicial moronities Sonja will be putting on parade in the years ahead.
Most telling was the contrast Frank Ricci painted of the Sotomayor at the confirmation hearings, that is a introspective and restrained nominee vs. the insulting, aloof and belligerent judge that heard his case in New York.
God help us-at least Frankin will probably be gone in 6 years-the damage this woman will do over the next 20 years is incalculable. MM
. The deal, as I see it, is Jeremy, and the Democrats know this, that once in place FDR2 will be impossible to reverse through legislative initiative. All of which leaves these options, which I list as an academic exercise.
1. Violent overthrow 2. United States break-up 3. Civil War 4. Acquiescence and serfdom
Number 2 is the most benign, and therefore preferable. Number one would be the most temporarily satisfying, what with the mass hangings of those who caused it, but would likely lead to a never ending number 3, supersized. .
I agree Roger, I said what needs to happen, not what likely will happen. How does a bully know when he pushed some one too far? The ER physician tells him all about it. In the case of the dems, I hope it will be them getting thrown from office by voters in the next election, but it may very well be them getting thrown from office by voters in a violent upheaval. If the USA collapses into civil war, we will be wide open to attack by enemies as treacherous as the dems, and better armed.