|
DamNation! |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
|
DamNation! |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
They are forgetting something else those pesky hydroelectric dams are good for -- flood control.
So the next time the Cumberland River floods Burkesville or Nashville, remember that it was done for the good of the fish.
I belive that's the newly dedicated President Wm. J. Clinton Foot n' Crotch path.
c.umulus n.imbusi
That's such a great design for a pond! Where is that?
Never mind, I Googled it - Taiwan. Next time I'm there, I'm going to see it.
We've got a bunch of the loonies out here the Pacific Northwest wanting to tear out the some of the dams on the Snake River and on the Columbia "to save the fish".
I believe that if these dams are torn out, then those who are advocating for their removal do without the electricity they provide, regardless of where they live, near the dams or across the various states. Having the courage of their convictions, as it were.
Without those dams the Manhattan Project was not possible. For you Democrats, that's national defense.
WARNING: Water is very cold...and deep too.
I've been in each and every one of those Dams. That's what my father does, is rebuild Hydro Turbines from the ground up. Dams create year round jobs for hundreds of people, and temporary (but long, usually 1-9 years) jobs to rebuild them, as contractors. The government or Corps of Engineers jobs are high paying with benefits (high five liberals) and the temporary ones are higher paid than that.
Flood control is obviously a major issue. You take out Dams anywhere, especially on the snake, and you're in trouble. A bunch of little towns, including Twin Falls, Burley, Idaho Falls and probably Pocatello, would be underwater.
But, hey, Idaho went for McCain last year, didn't it?
And just as a side note. Half of the dams that are removed, are removed because they're high risk for accidents and what not. I remember talking to someone when I was younger, his name escapes me, but he says that the cost of regular 'maintenance' (which is more like an overhaul) is something a lot of privately owned Dams are not willing to undertake, because they don't know the political life expectancy of their power stations.
Why sink money into something the dumbasses are just going to force you to tear down later.