“
|
OldSpookinteresting
"editorial" I found, its may have some resonance here. Due to the
author I was unsure if it was allowable on the front page, since some
might see this as me proselytizing.
Visual and electronic media, today’s dominant media, need a certain
kind of content. They thrive on brevity, speed, change, urgency,
variety and feelings. But thinking requires the opposite. Thinking
takes time. It needs silence and the methodical skills of logic.
Today’s advances in technology have increased the sources of human
information that the average layperson can access. That’s a good thing.
But they’ve also undermined the intellectual discipline that we once
had when our main tools of communication were books or print
publications. This is not a good development. In fact, it’s a very
dangerous thing in a democracy, which is a form of government that
demands intellectual and moral maturity from its citizens to survive.
Most people who follow the news, for instance, can probably tell you
that about 46 million Americans lack health insurance. But most of
those same people have little or no grasp of the very different reasons
for why 46 million Americans lack health insurance – because that story
gets much less attention.
Thomas Jefferson, writing during his presidency, put the importance of
a free press this way: “ No experiment can be more interesting than
that we are now trying, and which we trust will end in establishing the
fact, that man may be governed by reason and truth. Our first object
should therefore be, to leave open to him all the avenues to truth. The
most effectual hitherto found, is the freedom of the press.”
news organizations can’t have it both ways. They can’t claim to be
impartial guardians of truth in American political life and then act
like celebrity groupies at the same time.
The news media, despite their claims of impartiality, and despite the
good work they often do accomplish, are just as prone to prejudice,
ignorance, bad craftsmanship and tribalism as any other profession. But
unlike other professions, the press has constitutional protections. It
also has real power in shaping how we think, what we think about and
what we like, dislike and ignore. America’s media, including its news
media, are the greatest catechetical syndicate in history. And if that
kind of power doesn’t make us uneasy, it should at least make us alert.
When the press portrays itself as the “tribune of the people,” ensuring
the honesty of the other major institutions in our society through
relentless critical scrutiny – then we need to ask the question, who
scrutinizes the press? Who keeps our news media honest? Who holds them
accountable for humiliating one political candidate while fawning over
another? Nobody elected Brian Williams as the NBC news anchor. And
readers can’t impeach the editor of The New York Times – though some
people I know would find that a happy thought.
What we can do is refuse to be stupid. We can decline to be sandbagged
by our news establishment into thinking that marriage for homosexual
partners is inevitable or an obligation of social justice; or that
Islam and Christianity lead to pretty much the same conclusions about
freedom, society and the nature of the human person; or that the
abortion issue is somehow “settled” when thousands of unborn children
continue to be legally killed everyday.
[Render Unto Caesar that which is Caesar's render unto God that which is God's]
What we owe Caesar above all is honest, vigorous, public moral witness
on abortion and every other vital social issue, whether Caesar likes it
or not. [We need to be] the kind of citizens who demand that our news
media act with the sobriety, integrity, fairness and honesty their
vocation requires.
Archbishop Charles Chaput
|
” |
And Finally ...
OldSpookAnd I admit I do tend to proselytize, even if its in a "soft" manner here.
Think of it this way: If you truly believe what you have is the best
means of salvation, and you truly care about those you are with, then
how can you NOT share it, even if only in a soft, gentle fashion? What
does it say of my valuation of you were I to not bother?
Penn (of Penn and Teller), an avowed atheist (who has said "The Bible is Bullshit"), puts it well.
|
|