Art Laffer's excellent column in today's WSJ (Taxes, Depression, and Our Current Troubles )
set me in motion. Excellent because Laffer has an ability to distill
weighty economic theory down to a simple, easily digestible syrup.
While recognizing that I hardly qualify to sneer at anybody's
intelligence quotient, there are two areas where I most certainly do. Anybody promoting
the notion of man caused climate change, or anybody claiming that
Reagan's adherence to Laffer Curve principles was a disaster, is too
freaking stupid Inbreeding
to be taken seriously on any matter. These three
short videos are guaranteed to confer upon the viewer a better
understanding of tax policy than possessed by any elected Democrat in
the nation . Period. Even watching the first 3
minutes of L1 may suffice. Watch, and enjoy hilarity
like this from L3:
“
|
Here's
a real-world example. Back in 1989, I worked for Senator Bob Packwood
of Oregon. As the ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, he sent
a letter to the JCT, asking how much tax revenue would be raised if the
government confiscated every penny of income about $200,000. What did
the JCT say? On your screen, you can see Senator Packwood's November 14
floor statement in the Congressional Record.
As the Senator explained, the JCT estimated that this 100 percent tax
rate would collect $104 billion in 1989, rising to $299 billion in
1993. And when Senator Packwood asked the bureaucrats whether this was
realistic, they gave him the same revenue estimate, but included a
footnote stating "that these estimated taxes do not account for any
behavioral response." This is sort of like the fiscal equivalent of
"other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?" (Laffer 3)
|
” |
|
|