Axelrod's broken record

Axelrod’s missing facts

"If Democrat Operative is going to take issue with _AMERICAN  numbers, then Democrat Operative  should have the decency to actually cite what specific facts AMERICAN got wrong." This so elementary a response, when dealing with those people, that it should be hard-wired into the brain of any would-be defender of the faith, or guardian of the Republic. . Alex Conant demonstrates.  “ In a personally scathing piece today in the Washington Post, David Axelrod defends President Obama’s budget management, saying that Karl Rove’s recent criticism are factually inaccurate: There’s an old saying that everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts. The next time Karl Rove would like to offer us some advice, I’d urge him to take that to heart. I know the Obama Administration is eager to pick fights with their predecessors, in part because they still like the Bush-Obama comparisons. But if Axelrod is going to take issue with Rove’s numbers, then he should have the decency to actually cite what specific facts Rove got wrong. But he doesn’t do that; no where in the article does he say what facts Rove got wrong — probably because every fact cited by Rove was 100 percent accurate. ” Read Axelrod's haughty, condescending Post article, and notice what the real message is.  Blame Bush.