In passing |
|
|
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
In passing |
|
|
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
Gee I used to think pretty highly of JFK but I should know a dimmie is a dimmie is a dimmie. We can thank him for unresponsive, surly worthless government workers eh? He is now not on my list of favored pols. I think the list gets smaller by the day. Any Repub that does not embrace this golden opportunity will not be on it either!
bolivar
Krugman turns on BHO and says he really isn't the long-awaited messiah? It's Jiffy-Pop popcorn time.
I'd better erase those pics on my cell phone. Could all of you to whom I sent them please delete them too?
Casca
Jeeze Casca - what were you thinking? Hustler is paying $50 a peace for candid cell phone pics.....
I've read nearly every book writ on the Kennedy assassination because I liked him, and was incredulous over all the inconsistencies. I mentioned some to my boss once, and he replied, "What if the people involved were the good guys?"
Whoa.
I reject assassination as a legitimate tool in a democratic society, but that certainly made me consider other aspects of Kennedy's presidency.
In 1994, the Democrats' wake up call came when they lost their majorities in the house and senate. Clinton changed his rhetoric to try and minimize the damage, but it didn't matter--the damage was already done.
This time, the Democrats' wake up call was the loss of a single senate seat. And the thought occurred to me: what if they realize their mistake and change their ways? If they did, they could minimize the damage they would have otherwise suffered in November. They could conceivably maintain their majority and be able to cram through their progressive agenda. I'll admit, I was worried for a while.
But then I remembered who we're dealing with. These are people whose emotional development is on par with third graders. When things don't go their way, they throw tantrums, pout, and blame everyone else but themselves. And if you watch the news or cruise the intrawebz, you'll see that that's exactly what they're doing. And with a vengeance.
So have no fear, November will be a bloodbath for Democrats. In fact, it will probably be more so because the Democrat reaction to all of this will also include revenge on the people they feel are most responsible--the voters.
I have finally come to a firm conclusion.
0Bama is very well aware of what his fiscal policies are going to do to the United Staes. I think he wants it that way. I think his plan and intention is to wreck the US Economy forever.
I do not beleive that there will ever been any "coming to his senses" for this guy. I don't think he is ever going to change his direction. Not because he does not realize it is wrong, or foolish. But becasue he KNOWS what it will do. He WANTS it that way.
What I cannot figure is WHY.
The only way to fix this is to get rid of the guy. I just don't know if we can take 3 more years to do it.
Spunky, think of Obama as a drill instructor in the one-worlder boot-camp. Like his Marine DI equivalent, his job is to tear away every vestige of former beliefs, culture and history in order to rebuild us in his image of what's good. He IS A MARXIST revolutionary!
Wealthy but liberal dumbass Mortimer Zuckerman voted for The Community Organizer and Wonder Boy™, read all about his confession here.
c.umulus n.imbusi iii
"Dean was floating the absurd argument that by choosing Scott Brown over Martha Coakley, voters were sending a secret coded message that they really wanted a health care bill . . . more liberal than the current Obamacare version."
This was clearly the message I got from the Brown victory.
As the saying goes, you just couldn't make this kind of thing up.
I think I will celebrate by doing the Dean scream out the back door.
From the wikipedia link on Jim Moran "In about 2000 he got into a scuffle with an eight year old boy in Alexandria, whom he accused of attempting to carjack him.[3]" Which one of you peckerheads added this? It's funny, alright.
It's also true.