Russian Raptor Killer is a "Game Changer" |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Russian Raptor Killer is a "Game Changer" |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
In head to head air combat tests, F-22 slaughtered F-35. F-35 is jack of all trades and master of none. It doesn't do VSTOL as well as the Harrier, the aerial combat role as well as F-22, the CAS role as well as A-10 or F-18 because of range/payload limitations, but it is a good political contribution ( Joint Strike Fighter) to Euroweenie aerospace employment.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
i know.
It will be interesting to see what happens on this front.
It's hard envisioning the Russians developing much more than the cropduster of modern military aviation - the MIG.
One more thing - I'm betting the F-35 doesn't work out as a carrier fighter/attack plane. The designers still don't have the landing gear strength/arresting hook attachment durabilty needed for carrier ops. Shades of McNamara's F-111 carrier fighter fiasco. There is a long history for the phrase "Jack of all trades - master of none".
I was just reading an article in Aviation Week on this very subject (Elder Son&Heir is studying to be an Aerospace Engineer) and they were saying the thing that the Russkies rolled out and flew was more an existing Sukhoi Su-30something AND apparently the new King Hell Sov.., er, Russian engines are unreliable and can't be used in operational aircraft for a long time. AvWeek's take was that essentially this Russky plane is akin to us taking an F-15 to Burbank and letting Lockheed play with it for a couple of years.
- One Man Gang
One man, I was wondering something like that - I didn't see any evidence of vectored thrust in that video.
As to reliabilty, those engines only need to last a couple weeks if they build enough aircraft to swarm our small F-22 fleet.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
An nuke engineer friend of mine (Armenian decent) who is fluent in Russian and worked many years in Russia had the following opinion:
"If the Cold War turned hot and the Soviets launched a nuclear strike, I wouldn't have been surprised if they were all killed off by their own missiles"
Tailgunner:
I too have never been comfortable with the F-35. It development struck me eerily similar to the mindset of pre WWII USA in regards to its military: ie. P-40 too expensive, take out the superchargers! (which led to it being an easy kill during high altitude combat against the Japanese Oscar and Zero).
We ended up with cheap, disposable aircraft manned by disposable pilots for the early part of the war.
If we are spending less than 6% of our GNP on defense, we are risking war through the projection of weakness.
And weakness of our nation is exactly the point for Obullpoop.