This
morning I direct your attention to articles by the only group more
confused about the Tea Party movement than the Republican Party; asshat
liberals. First, Joe Conason. Of all the hacks who made a
living defending President Bill Clinton's every fart and burp, Conason
was among the most shameless. He managed to go eight
years without writing a single paragraph that could survive a
rudimentary fact-check. Here he is, toady, on Salon.
“
|
How
will Republicans, and in particular Washington's’s neoconservative
Republicans, cope with libertarian-leaning Rand Paul as their party’s
Senate nominee in Kentucky? Having denounced the son of Ron as a kooky
isolationist only days ago, their responses to his victory have ranged
from sugarcoating to stunned silence. Now they just want to hold that
seat.
|
” |
Just fine Joe. But, who are these neoconservative Republicans,
Joe? Mitch McConnell? That's what the Tea-party is about
you clod; America first, not a political party. The only
difference between today's elected Democrats and Republicans is not all
Republicans are shameless liars. And no Republican is a
socialist, Marxist, Maoist, Obamunists, nor any other kind of
ideologue-ist. Gah!
If Conason had a peer when it came to apologizing for the Clintons, it was Gene Lyons, a co-author with Conason of The Hunting of the President: The 10 Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton. Take it away Gene.
“
|
One
minor mystery of the Obama administration is whether the president has
actually believed that the nation's most intractable problems could be
solved by the wonder-working power of bipartisanship and the emollient
balm of his personality. He wouldn't be the first politician whose ego
convinced him he could sweet-talk his bitterest opponents.
|
” |
That's the lede from his Salon article, No, GOP, you can't have the car keys back;
your warning to have a vomit bag at the ready. Salon, by the
way, is the interweb's version of HBO; giving face time to
Bill Maher types who are otherwise unemployable. Lyons continues
with a paean to the greatest job creationist since Michael Dukakis
pulled off the "Massachusetts Miracle."
“
|
It's
a fact. Should current growth persist, the U.S. economy will gain
roughly 1.7 million jobs this year. From 2001 through 2008, the Bush
economy generated about 1 million.
|
” |
Let's forget that the Administrations "job creation" numbers are rife with this sort of fraud
“
|
Recovery.gov
also shows 2,893.9 jobs created with $194,537,372 in stimulus funding
in New Hampshire’s 00 congressional district. But, there is no such
thing.
|
” |
Or that Moody's
estimates that offering tax breaks to businesses that hire new
employees, creates jobs at a cost of ... $43,000 a pop!
Let's forget that George Bush inherited Bill Clinton's dot.com recession, and turned it around with tax cuts. No, let's see if four years hence Obama's bone crushing taxes a-coming yield anywhere near a million net jobs created (and government jobs don't count). Any bets?
|
Marcus Aurelius Miller
|