Sunday, June 13, 2010
8 comments:
-
Bob Hawkins said...
-
Nobody stopped Karl Marx or whoever made "Howard the Duck."
This is like the guy who chopped the tails off mice for dozens of generations and found they were still born with tails, disproving the inheritance of acquired characteristics. His paper was rejected on grounds that the experiment had already been done using foreskins.
Turing word: "peocted". Is that the medical term for de-foreskinning? "Peoctomy"? -
6/13/10, 1:30 PM
-
JMcD said...
-
Well, that is at least, one very smart scientist.
He is wearing eye protection against those dangerous "bunny molestation" juices,instead of working unprotected as so many are wont to do.
Undoubtedly this fine researcher is a graduate of the Dr. Silvana School of Proper Laboratory Technique.
Dr. Silvana wore eye protection religiously,even outside the lab,in certain confrontations with his enemy, that bastard, Captain Marvel. -
6/13/10, 1:56 PM
-
JMcD said...
-
Hahahaha....Just kidding,
Actually, back in comic book days, I preferred Captain Marvel 10 to 1
over Superman (the lowlife who sued the good Captain and put him out of business).
I guess the reason for my preference was that I felt that the Cap't,Mary, and Cap't Jr. could have live in my town whereas Supra was a hoity-toity prick who could only live in a city the likes of NY,NY.
Talk about your 'human interest stories'. -
6/13/10, 2:07 PM
-
DougM said...
-
"QED Time travel is impossible."
Wrong!
That's actually proof that there's a conspiracy to cover up the existence of time travel. -
6/13/10, 3:18 PM
-
JMcD said...
-
Well...we all hope TIME travels...
maybe to a galaxy far, far away. -
6/13/10, 4:02 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
My brother used to say that we were always travelling in time at the rate of 1 second per second... unless you start going into motion, which at relativistic speeds (say, .5c) could get you travelling at LESS than 1 second per second (say, half a second per second). NASA proved that with the Apollo flights (though not quite as dramatically.
Proof enough, at least, that this mad scientist has yet to sufficiently define "time travel." -
6/13/10, 6:09 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
I liked Howard the Duck. It was definitely Tim Robbins finest work.
Laurence -
6/13/10, 9:32 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
The proof should continue thusly:
"But since I haven't yet traveled in time then perhaps someone has stopped me." drummermanrick -
6/13/10, 10:58 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)