The Cultures Wars .. we lost |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
The Cultures Wars .. we lost |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
And in the Helmsley and Posner cases, millions were left to maintain pets.......
"legal teeth"?
O tempora, o mores.
Ah, my hometown, that's actually Canton, Ohio. If you want it done right... .
Casca
I'm not a lawyer... but it's my understanding that placing restrictions or conditions on property or people in a will is not legal.
There was a case maybe 20 years ago that a devout Jew had put in his will that his son could not inherit unless he married a Jewish woman. He married a non-Jew. A judge awarded the son the estate, saying the dead have no power to make the rules for the living.
The old sitcom saw that someone could only inherit a rich relative's estate if they spent the night in their spooky old house is a nice plot device, but has no basis in reality.
Wills can ONLY say who gets what. Anything else will be shot down by a court.
AWM
Yeah, it amounts to saying "You own the house but you don't have the rights of ownership." Well, make up your mind or a judge will make it up for you.
Turing word: "connabli". The Latin word for shack-up?
This is a classic example of ad hoc decision-making by pathetic, agenda-driven judges passing for jurisprudence.
A man should be able to leave his property to whomever he pleases under whatever terms he selects.
Ditto for Ms. Petry.
The Constitution protects against governmental discrimination (as long as the judge likes whoever's ox is being gored).
It does not prohibit an individual from giving property to religious organizations.
Perhaps one day you can get Akron in the sights on the B-52.
I am hopeful that the Court of Appeals will reverse this judge.
The time is coming, the tree of liberty is hungry. How much longer will we accept this abuse of our freedom?
well, it all goes back to the differences between "fee simple absolute" and "fee simple defeasible" or "fee simple determinable"...
she really can't put that kind of final clause in there (the one about the mission could ONLY sell it to someone who would use it for ANY SPECIFIC purpose).. she was fine right to there, and then her lawyer let her jump the tracks.
{my own opinion, your mileage may vary}
RetRsvMike
I can literally see that house from mine. Wonder if this is the same Dennis R. Clunk that is the City Treasurer for the city of Alliance, Ohio... just east of Canton. He has a big ole "D" after his name. I'm shocked.
The dead do not have rights. Only the living.
Weird will provisions are shot down all the time in probate courts.
This is not unusual, new, or evil. It has been standard legal practice in this country for a very long time.