America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution |
||||
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Friday, July 23, 2010
Brilliant Essay
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
6 comments:
-
-
This is the conventional wisdom today, but it's just dead wrong. Socialism/progressiveism came to the US en mass in the form of the 48ers. Europe had a failed socialist coup within 9 countries in 1849. They all fled to the US and found a nice warm place within the German/Austrian community and in the Lincoln administration. They were the true founders of the Republican party. Lincoln had three cabinet appointees that were actual drinking buddies of Karl Marx. They were a huge part of creating the federal monster we have now, that did not exist prior to then. No one loves a big centralized government like a socialist. The American progressives held sway over reconstruction of the South.
The best look at this, is "Red Republicans".
Plowboy - 7/23/10, 9:25 AM
- BruHa said...
-
http://thebruha.blogspot.com/2010/03/progressivismliberalismsocialismfascism.html
Progressivism/liberalism/socialism/fascism/monarchy/oligarchy/dictatorship and other forms of statism are based on the idea that normal people are incapable of handling their own affairs.
They all assume that
(1) there is an elite group of enlightened people who can manage things,
(2) these enlightened despots will not be the same ones who screw up the private organizations that they deem to be the problem in need of fixing,
(3) these will be the people actually put into the positions of authority, and
(4) bureaucrats will be hired to administer the enlightened elite’s dictates.
Unfortunately, that theory quits thinking just before the point where it is clear that
(5) the positions of authority cannot always be filled by the necessary enlightened elite, and
(6) the bureaucrats hired to handle other people’s affairs will be normal people who are incapable of handling their own affairs.
Bureaucrats do not serve the people — they serve the bureaucracy. - 7/23/10, 10:41 AM
- Rodger the Real King of France said...
-
Plowboy, while I don't disagree, I get the feeling you didn't read the article.
- 7/23/10, 10:46 AM
- DougM said...
-
BruHa,
Thought that sounded familiar, even though it was four months ago.
(good man, providing the link on your site)
Thanks for passing it along ... and reminding me of those optimistic days. - 7/23/10, 11:38 AM
- BruHa said...
-
DougM,
Phew! Got nervous that I did not credit SondraK on my site for the original. I sometimes do that unintentionally when I'm drinking/posting. And damn it The real King and SondraK always have the best stuff. (I sometimes wonder why i bother at all.)
:-) - 7/23/10, 12:48 PM
- DougM said...
-
Nah, it's cool, man.
(I don't actually talk like that)
I was just tickled to get quoted. Well, out of court, anyway. - 7/25/10, 1:11 AM