Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Traffic Cams Ticketed!

Today's I'll Fix That For You
Receive a traffic cam ticket in the mail?
A Supreme Court  ruling last year requiring that scientists be made available to testify in court cases about lab evidence they prepare may have the added effect of curtailing the use of automated traffic-enforcement cameras to assess criminal penalties.
The crux of this story is that various courts have taken a cue from that SCOTUS lab evidence ruling,  and applied it to traffic and speed cams. 
Judge Wilson said declarations submitted to the court  by the private enforcement company to support the red-light infractions "contain testimonial hearsay," without which the officer cannot identify the photographs as taken by the company, cannot attest they pertain to any actual traffic violation and cannot say with certainty the camera equipment was in working order at the time of the violation.
If states were really interested in protecting, not taxing the public, speed cams like this would be in use.
The effect of these rulings is that methods for obtaining, transmitting and storing information about infractions are "not admissible in the absence of a live witness with personal knowledge of the procedures."  Which translates into requiring speed cam suppliers to send technicians to testify at ticket hearings.  There are not enough technicians, and they're too far away to travel to every court hearing anyway.  Cases are being thrown-out wholesale.  This of course will have the same effect on tax hungry city officials as failing to pay Louie the loan-shark his vigorish.  Stay tuned.

ASIDE:
Mo Sup makes regular trips to Tidewater,VA to see family.  During a recent trip she noticed that the yellow light timing at stop lights in Gloucester had gone from something reasonable,  to about 1 second. The thought occurred to her that this is precisely what Baltimore City did when when traffic cams were installed.  She skoonched  forward at a stop light, and looked up.  Sure enough,  perched high atop a pole - the camera. My suggestion that she use her 9mm to shoot the sumbitch fell on deaf ears however. She's such a pussy sometimes.

Boned Jello

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

In El Paso, they changed red light running from a moving violation to a civil violation, thus negating the idea that someone has to testify. They claim it's stopped collisions but have not cited reliable sources showing that accidents have dropped. It's all anecdotal. S***heads just need more money and do this as well as raising taxes on property owners.

Anonymous said...

Why doesn't the aclu pour $ into defending this obvious invasion of privacy?

An ignorant dickweed said...

Accidents increase at intersections with red light cameras.

DougM said...

First time I've run across the word "vigorish" on a blog (good word, needs more exercise).
Not sure if there's a prize involved, or if it's even significant. Just, uhm, thought I'd mention it.
(What? Yeah, people look at me like that all the time.)

Ralph Gizzip said...

She's such a pussy sometimes.

Isn't that why you married her?

Anonymous said...

Number 15,356 on the list of most soul ripping problems with living in El Paso.

Al Qaeda, MS13, Zeta's, Crips, Bloods, Irish Republican Army, and Green Peace have you surrounded, and you are worried about a speed cam?

Anonymous said...

Long story short, I got one of these tickets, (redlight) and asked if my wife could come for the hearing because both she and I are on the registration but I was named for the ticket, not her.

The lady asked me if I was driving and I said no. She said that if I write a letter saying that I wasnt driving that the ticket would be dropped. I did and it was. Location: Tacoma, Wa

You're welcome.

thoR~
III

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.