Friday, October 22, 2010

Paging Ruth Lessness

When a Hostile Takeover is in Order

Hostile Takeover

From The Daily Caller this morning: GOP House majority must be wary of ‘cranky electorate,’ consultant says.    
As they begin to govern, Republicans will need to keep in mind that their favorability is under 50 percent,” wrote Sara Taylor Fagen, a former White House political director for President George W. Bush. “The electorate is extremely cranky and will likely remain this way for some time.”

To maintain control of the House, Fagen wrote, a Republican majority must realize that voters “will be slow to trust and quick to discard people they perceive as typical politicians.

They're not off to a very good start:
Rep. Darrell Issa seems like a man of contradictions. If Republicans take the House of Representatives he’ll be the Republican point man on the House Committee that investigates the government (aka the Obama administration).

But Issa has struck a conciliatory tone in recent days. He told the Wall Street Journal Tuesday that Americans expect Congress to “create compromise and advance their agenda. They want us to come together after we agree to disagree." [The Note]


Boehner offers plum committees to GOP challengers  similarly signals same-old -same-old, and translates into "Play for Pork."  I don't trust Boner to begin with; reminds me of the smarmy Trent Lott.

The force driving this revolution is the realization that we are engaged in an ideological war to determine whether this nation lives or dies. I don't get a sense that any but a few congressional Republicans recognize that.  Unless they go in with bayonets; demand unconditional surrender; giving no quarter, then all is lost.  You know I'm right. 



6 comments:

JMcD said...

War is hale, or by golly, ought'a be.

Anonymous said...

I heard a little CSPAN yesterday- a couple of 'Republican spokesmen' being asked if they were really the party of 'No' and why they did not have a positive, alternate policy agenda.

Dumb & Dumber mumbled that sometimes all the minority party could do was kind of slow things down and not really, um, you know... that's what the Democrats always do so we can too...

How about

"Not the party of 'No.' We're the party of 'Hell No!' when the government so far overreaches constitutional authority, nationalizing major sectors of the economy and driving a fragile economy over a cliff. One example: Cash for Clunkers: this administration borrowed $3B dollars to take over 690,000 serviceable vehicles off the road and destroy them. That is over $4,000 per car to destroy wealth. 690,000 fewer people could drive to work, 690,000 fewer vehicles could be sold at used car lots, 690,000 drivers were denied entry level transportation, and 690,000 sources of second hand parts were removed from the repair pool. In the middle of a horrible economy where all sources of wealth are needed, this government destroyed privately held wealth in order to saddle the taxpayer with servicing another $3B in debt- you bet we say Hell No!

No alternative suggestions? That pathetic misrepresentation of the facts will not stand. Take this partisan overreach to nationalize health care. Republicans proposed real reform that would reduce cost and improve care, such as:
1. interstate competition
2. decoupling health care from employment
3. tort reform
While these measures would demonstrably reduce cost and improve availability, they also run counter to the Democrats real objective- a government run health care system."

Rodger, why don't you manage messaging for the republican party and drive these morons from the field of intellectual battle?

jr

Rodger the Real King of France said...

OMG, you mean I'm not? Yikes. PS- You forgot mass impeachment of judges

Chuck Martel said...

"3. tort reform"

That has already been taken care of in the Bill of Rights. It's called the seventh amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved . . . ."

Whether it is the first or second or seventh, I support them all.

molonlabe28 said...

Boehner is an old party warhorse.

We can't trust him.

Anonymous said...

jr
Anonymous Anonymous @ 10/22/10 9:11 AM

Go here and watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwH58myuQms

You will be very distressed. I shouted at the screen watching stupid destruction. My truck is 16 years older than that truck, needs a paint job, but in all their 'wisdom' our 'betters' have decreed things shall be destroyed that have real value. Once I saw this, I knew they were actually insane.
tomw

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.