TODAY DOUBLE HANGING 2 down, 612 to go |
|
|
click
to read warrants
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
TODAY DOUBLE HANGING 2 down, 612 to go |
|
|
click
to read warrants
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
Dang, these hangin's is gettin' fancy. However my liege, you've transposed the links, and for the life of me, I don't understand your opposition to net neutrality.
Casca
P.S. I'd still hang him.
If "Net Neutrality" is found to be constitutional, then we need TV neutrality and print neutrality and radio neutrality.
We'll have Rush and Michael Savage on NPR.
Anne Coulter and Michelle Malkin editorial columns in the NYFT and WA PO.
CBS NBC and ABC and CNN will all have to show Lou Dobbs and Hannity shows in equal proportion to their liberal horse crap.
Oh- we don't want all that ?
Well then guess fucking what - NO NET NEUTRALITY!
Net neutrality is nice sounding. What it will do is the opposite of what happened after the break-up of Ma Bell. Regulation will result in my not being able to choose how I purchase the good we call access to the internet.
Let providers set their own prices and policies. Please.
.
Thanks Casca - fixed, although I can't imagine both wouldn't hang regardless.
As to my opposition:
1) The bill was rejected by congress 2-1. What's happening here is an unelected regulator making an end run around the constitution. That's a hanging offense.
Secondarily, I am opposed to government's involvement in any way, manner, or form with the internet. Period. I think, so should you be.
It's a complicated issue, but right now the providers are throttling our access to web content. I'm against that. Google and the other inter-thugs may be on the side of the angels on this one. Some regulation is obviously necessary. Until then, we're in exactly the position we were before the breakup of Ma Bell, kinda sorta.
Casca
When in doubt, do the opposite of what ever Moveon.org advocates.
Rodg, I don't often get on your case, but come on:
"Secondarily, I am opposed to government's involvement in any way, manner, or form with the internet."
What's next, keep gummint's hands off your social security checks?
I'm cornfuzzed. [no. srsly.] How is the situation different now than "the position we were before the breakup of Ma Bell?" Except for the invention of the handy-dandy pocket fone, I'm in exactly the same situation re fones as before the MaBell break-up. Like with electricity the "choice" is, "use ours or use none."
I currently have lots of choices for da InnerToobz. Which I dearly hope the damned gubbmint keeps its nasssty paws off of.
As a blogger I hate the idea that I might have to end every post with "here are some dumbasses who "think" differently" and a link to MoveOn or HuffPoo.
What was that up-side, again?
e~C