J's 20,22,35 |
|||
|
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
J's 20,22,35 |
|||
|
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
This Joint Strike Fighter, JSF, mentality is what got us the F-111 POS. I don't think the Navy ever used it.
Putting all of one's eggs in one basket was never a good plan.
JLW III
Yes Roger, but you're a patriot, and Bill Gates went to Harvard.
Casca
F-35, the jack of all trades, master of none, is a clusterfuck political sop to our euro "allies". Behind schedule, over cost, undercapable. People in the program have told me that the F-22 kicks f-35 ass every time in air to air, F-18 and A-10 are more CAS capable, have better range, load and loiter. VSTOL simply doesn't work yet, and for that we have Harrier in service. Have I missed anything?
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
There's that pesky Neutrality Act of 1794 et seq. Don't forget what Cornelius Vanderbilt and the U.S. Government did to William Walker when he tried something like that in Central America. The Feds don't like the competition.
Ex C-141 Flight Engineer here.. your gonna need transport planes.... I believe all the C-141s are sitting in the sun at Davis Monthon.. I am sure we could send a team out there to reclaim a few.
You guys know that it won't be long until remotely piloted vehicles will greatly exceed the g-limit of the human pilot. When that happens, any plane with a human on board looses. That may be a huge factor in the decision to back off the JSF program. I'm told entire classes of trained F-16 pilots are herded into RPV's now and will probably never fly a plane again. -Anymouse
And of course, we already have flying saucers at Area 51. I mean that.
"...won't be long until remotely piloted vehicles will greatly exceed the g-limit of the human pilot."
Off-the-shelf R/C models already do 40+ G's measured.
Leave it to your imagination as to what the govt spook stuff can probably do, but the stories of 'UFO's doing right-angle turns should give you the idea...
I believe that the F-35 Program was put on hold, by the one, because of cost over runs.
DE644
RPV fighters are not the future.
RPVs only work on enemies too primitive to figure out how to jam their control signals.
Great fro keeping the wogs' heads down, but against a serious opponent, they will lose.
When I hear that they want the F-35 to replace the A-10 I roll my eyes. No way the F-35 is going to the have the advantages of an A-10.. a flying, heavily armored piece of artillery with wings.
Think back to the beginning of WWII, when we faced a well trained air force with better equipment. We sent Brewster Buffalos, underpowered Wildcats, P-40's without superchargers against the Zero and Oscar. Disposable aircraft with disposable pilots. Sending men against the IJN with the Devastator Torpedo bomber was an act that was almost criminal. The only thing the plane was devastating on were the men who flew it.
The F-35 will be the Brewster Buffalo of the 21st Century. Pray to whatever God you believe in that the USA can bounce back (again).
May I suggest reading "BOYD, THE FIGHTER PILOT WHO CHANGED THE ART OF WAR" by Robert Coram. A detailed, behind-the-scenes account of a mid-level air force officer who basically wrote the performance spec on the F-16, and, to a lesser degree, the F-15.
During his briefings for the upper brass, he LOVED showing the performance graphs of the F-111 and how it was a DOG in the skies.
"F-22 kicks f-35 ass every time"
Of course it does. The F-22 is optimized to air-to-air; the F-35 is a multi-role aircraft. It was never intended to go head-to-head with an F-22. The F-22 provides top cover while the F-35 goes in and makes some rubble. They're complementary.
As for RPVs: I keep hearing about the possibility of a "Pearl Harbor in cyberspace," while the Chinese recently demonstrated they can shoot down a satellite, so the answer for the Air Force is to.... buy more on RPVs that rely on cyberspace routed through satellites? If either of these comes to pass, what's Plan B for US airpower?
And also, we're going to rely more and more on automation, built with computer chips made.... where, exactly? Overseas somewhere, in the Far East? Well, OK!
"JSF mentality"
The ghost legacy of Robert McNamara.
Per Robert Heinlein, "There are no dangerous weapons, only dangerous weapons."
Technology is definitely a force multiplier. However, its always bothered me how dependent we've become upon hi-tech stuff.
Wars are still won by the poor damn rifleman who occupies ground and kills the enemy face-to-face. Everyone else is either combat support or service support.
Brigadier Major Mike
I'm an idiot.
Quote shouild read, "There are no dangerous weapons, only dangerous men."
The fine motor skills required for typing disappear with advanced age.
Brigadier Major Mike
Read:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A0232ae38-bb7a-4edc-a1a1-efbd8f3648d4&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest
Did Shot-Down F-117 Aid J-20 Development?
wtf do I know?, I was in the navy...
tomw