Received E-Mail from a
friend suggesting I look at this week's TIME
ragazzine.
"The content and tenor of the article
falls outside the normal Time lockstep, with the Obama administration"
I did. The goose-stepping looks pretty much the same,
considering. I mean, Obama's failure is out there. It's as
plain to see as a wad of hand cream on a dark blue dress.
Somethings can't be ignored, only camouflaged. In a recent survey
47% of Americans said that they would have to
sell some of their possessions, if they had to come up with $2000 (like
paying to get a car transmission fixed, or paying the utility
bill). Splat!
It's hard for TIME subscribers to swallow this, unaccustomed as they are to
intra-cult criticism. But, if you must man-up and deliver foul tasting
medicine, the old hide-it-between-slices-of bread gambit is time proven effective.
|
Republicans
are trying to pin every economic problem on Obama in the run-up to the
2012 election. Let's be clear: the slow growth the U.S. is experiencing
is not an Obama-specific problem. Many of the ingredients in it were
already baked into the economy and were simply laid bare by the
financial crisis.
|
” |
|
But at the
same time, the growth problem is Obama's. Every President inherits his
predecessor's economy; indeed, it's often what gets him the job. It's
then up to the new guy to change the numbers as well as the debate. Now
it looks as if Obama is losing that debate.
|
” |
|
The Republicans have pulled off a major (some
would say cynical) miracle by convincing the majority of Americans that
the way to jump-start the economy is to slash taxes on the wealthy and
on cash-hoarding corporations while cutting benefits for millions of
Americans. It's fun-house math that can't work; |
” |
They've been doing stuff like this since shortly after Henry Luce
went to heaven.
|