Bad
Judges
10th Circuit: Amendment Banning Sharia Law is Not OK |
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Bad
Judges
10th Circuit: Amendment Banning Sharia Law is Not OK |
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
What? Pass your own laws? Not bloody likely!
This ruling flabbergasts me:
Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, known as the Supremacy Clause, establishes the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Treaties, and Federal Statutes made pursuant to the U.S. Constitution, as "the supreme law of the land."
How does the Establishment Clause enter into it? For heaven's sake, the US Constitution forbids Catholic Canon Law, as such, in civil legal practice, too.
Bad judges? REALLY?
How about UNCONSTITUTIONAL judges?
In California, we voted in 187, which banned welfare for illegals.
The Courts struck it down, and our elected officials wouldn't defend it.
Later we passed Prop. 8, defining marriage as being one man and one woman.
Those who didn't like it sued saying it was "unconstitutional," our elected officials won't defend it, and our fate rests in the Court system yet again.
It could be said that we should elect OFFICIALS THAT SHARE OUR VALUES, which would be helpful; but still.
It's the right result but for the wrong reason. What's the right reason?
Comity.
Doug, it seems to me that we're hit with a new flabbergastation every single day. We're a nation run amok.
A properly worded state constitutional amendment would forbid legal systems and laws that are entirely based on any theocratic law system.
This would forbid sharia without singling it out.
( Our legal system it based on the roman/greek system. We do not have canon law in the US. )
As for treaty law ... that is an article of the constitution. ANY amendment ( including the bill of rights ) takes precedence over it.
These judges are the evil quietly foisted on us by the Clintons, obamas and establishment Repub presidents. If these black robes were not sitting on federal benches they would be in jogging gear chasing ambulances.
Rodge, yeah.
If I might be allowed a slight modification:
"We're a nation [whose government has] run amok."
"...Our legal system it based on the roman/greek system..."
I DON'T BLOODY THINK SO!!!
The laws of the 13 colonies and the republic of the United States is at root based upon ENGLISH COMMON LAW!
If you want justice based upon Roman style law move to New Orleans and enjoy the Napoleonic code. It's worked out so well there....
I'll stick with "A man's home is his castle" and "trial by a jury of the accuseds peers" and to be "Assumed innocent until proven guilty" and to "Be faced with ones accuser(s) in open court".
A century of progressive scum has all but destroyed the Common Law in the U.S. People who want to damage our God given rights, enshrined in among other works, the Common Law, really make me want to deprive them of their Common Law rights and imitate Vlad Tepes!
Armageddon Rex
Still bitter, and clinging to my guns!