“
|
Anybody who thinks that we can nominate somebody
who is not going to be the focus of a media-destruction campaign is
asinine,” Limbaugh said today, as he analyzed Mitt Romney’s strong
victory over Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul in the Florida
Republican Primary.
Whoever we nominate is who the campaign is going to be about, the
election. It’s not gonna be about Obama. The media can’t let it be
about Obama. If it’s about Obama, he’s sunk! It’s gonna have to be
about what a reprobate racist, sexist, mean-spirited, heartless creep
the Republican is. And I don’t care who the nominee is. It’s gonna be
about that. [Rush
Limbaugh]
Which
was exactly the case in 1996, and again 2008. There is a
way this can be controlled. During the 2008 silly season, for instance,
Howard Kurtz (Wa Post)
wrote:
“
|
Media
coverage of John McCain has been heavily unfavorable since the
political conventions, more than three times as negative as the
portrayal of Barack Obama, a new study says.
|
” |
The FCC could, by fiat (or, congress by legislation), say this.
Media news stories will be treated like paid commercials. So, for
example, if there were 900,000 minutes of media coverage, and
600,000 was pro Obama, the collective media would be fined
150,000 minutes( the advantage Obama was given) *the going
advertising rate. In this case, media would've been
compelled to give the McCain campaign (in weekly installments)
that sum of cash to use in counter advertising. I'll guess the
McCain campaign would have received about $3 billion in 2008.
This all makes sense to me, so it must be right. |
|
” |
|