| Teaparty
Tribune NJ Ballot Access Challenge Hearing Update |
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
3 comments:
-
Anonymous said...
-
Unfortunately, here is the rest of the story from Appuzzo's blog:
"Yet, in his decision, the ALJ said that because he does not have to consent to his nomination it did not matter who Obama is or where he may be born because he has no legal obligation to show that he is constitutionally eligible to run in the New Jersey primary for the Office of President.
Not only did he say that Obama has no legal duty to provide the State of New Jersey with any evidence that he is constitutionally eligible to be placed on the New Jersey primary ballot for election to the Office of President, the ALJ also said: 'Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.' Initial Decision, p. 7. Dr. Conspiracy, in light of the fact that there was absolutely no evidence before the ALJ as to where Obama was born, must be so embarrassed by the finding of the court that at his blog he tries to tell us that it is not true that the ALJ found Obama to be born in Hawaii. But on the contrary, from the quoted language, we can conclude that the ALJ found that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore based on that fact alone and with no reference to the citizenship of his parents, found that he is a “natural born Citizen.” But he made the finding that he was born in Hawaii without providing any explanation as to what evidence he relied upon to make such a finding. His Initial Decision is silent as to what evidence he relied upon to find that Obama was born in Hawaii. Also, the ALJ relied strictly upon U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) to rule that Obama, born to an alien father, is a “natural born Citizen.'
On April 12, 2012, Secretary of State, Kimberly M. Guadagno, issued her Final Decision in Nicholas E. Purpura and Theodore T. Moran v. Barack Obama New Jersey Primary Ballot Objection. A copy of her decision may be read here, http://www.scribd.com/puzo1/d/89431332-Final-Decision-of-SOS-in-Purpura-Moran-Ballot-Objection-4-12-12. She concludes without any explanation: 'After full consideration of the record and a review of the exceptions filed, I hereby adopt the ALJ’s Initial Decision in its entirety.'
The next step is an appeal directly to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division."
I'm dumbfounded by the logical disconnects and ignoring fact and law. Is there some switch in lawyering you have to flip to do this?
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick -
4/17/12, 12:34 PM
-
rickn8or said...
-
dick, if the ALJ insists on ruling without evidence, he could have save a lot of trouble for others by settling the "9mm vs. .45", "Freewill vs. Predestination", "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" and "Great taste vs. Less Filling" controversies while he was at it.
-
4/17/12, 5:07 PM
-
I-RIGHT-I said...
-
"Is there some switch in lawyering you have to flip to do this?"
No. I think the majority of modern day lawyers don't even have that circuit. You know, conscience informed by universally accepted morals and standards of conduct isn't a money maker so WTF do they need that for? I'm reminded that about99.99% of our elected representatives are lawyers and most of those are millionaires before their first term is up. You figure it out. -
4/17/12, 8:30 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)