Scalia: Health Care Mandate ‘Can’t Be a Pig’ "Bitch Slaps" Judge Nancy?
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Scalia lambastes -- somebody
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
5 comments:
- Jim - PRS said...
-
Had the pleasure of briefly meeting Justice Scalia a few years back. He's a regular guy who happens to be gorilla stompin' brilliant.
- 7/29/12, 3:16 PM
-
-
At the same time he also allows as how there is all sorts of gun control that can be done under the Second Amendment... which brings us to the question, whose bitch is who?
*spit* - 7/29/12, 5:02 PM
- Sarge said...
-
*spit*... how about "puke" ?
- 7/30/12, 1:40 AM
-
-
As previously noted:
"How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg?
Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."
A. Lincoln
IMO, should have been rejected for re-write. Let the Legislature do its job. !!As written!! it was noted as being un-constitutional.
What, do we 'interpret' words to be replaced with other words in black and white legislative text? Do we "Deem" it passed? Do we "Deem" it a tax? What is the difference?
It was passed fraudulently, without the normal hail of attacks it should have taken for being indeed a tax. All the brickbats and rotten tomatoes that would have been thrown at Congress for a new TAX somehow were left on the shelf at home. It needs to be paraded by the people in full bright letters that it is 'the largest tax increase in history', shouted from the rooftops, as they used to say.
tomw - 7/30/12, 10:14 AM
- Kristophr said...
-
Anonymous: No one is perfect, especially if perfect means agreeing with you 100% on politics.
One of the most pro-gun judges I have ever read about, Kozinski on the Ninth Circuit, is a conservative jew who wrote the original decision ordering that cross erected on National Forest land over Palm Springs to be torn down.
I agreed with this decision as well ... but you might not.
BTW, the cross stayed up. The folks who put it up got a clue, changed it into a proper war memorial, and the SCOTUS reversed Kozinski, because if they hadn't, fanatics would have sued over the crosses over graves in Arlington next. - 7/30/12, 12:55 PM