A Short History of Congress's Power to Tax The Supreme Court has long distinguished the regulatory from the taxing power.
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Sunday, July 08, 2012
A Short History of Congress's Power to Tax
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
5 comments:
-
-
What then? Hell, we're damn near there. Liberals are fixin to find out what 'useful idiot' means.
Tim - 7/8/12, 11:52 AM
- Kristophr said...
-
So what?
The Obamacare act will rack up a shitload of debt.
The "penalties" for not participating will be applied to that.
As that jackanapes Roberts has shown us, we can't depend on our serving for life nine man legislature to get us out of this. - 7/8/12, 12:52 PM
-
-
If I have my druthers, the new Congress will impeach Roberts and Ginsburg. She twice made the point during oral arguments that the penalty was not a tax:
"The Tax Injunction Act does not apply to penalties that are designed to induce compliance with the law, rather than to raise revenue. And this is not a revenue-raising measure because, if it's successful, they -- nobody will pay the penalty, and there will be no revenue to raise."
For Justice Ginsburg, "revenue-raising measure" = tax. And "this is not a revenue raising measure."
And on the second day she said "this penalty is designed to affect conduct. The conduct is buy health protection, buy health insurance before you have a need for medical care. That's what the penalty is designed to do, not to raise revenue."
Note that Justice Ginsburg is not asking a question, she is stating her position.
This means that Justice Ginsburg flipped her tax position from the oral argument to the final publishing of the decision.
She abandoned her own legal conclusion because it was the only way to have the law upheld.
Likewise Roberts. They have not upheld their oath and are blatantly legislating from the bench.
If the new Congress doesn't impeach them, then we can hope the Leftist bastards choke on their mandated broccoli.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick - 7/8/12, 4:08 PM
-
-
There are more of us than there are of them. They are NOT going to like it when we start pulling their own tricks against their favored classes and politicians, and they find the constitution no longer protects them.
Actually, I don't think we will, either. - 7/8/12, 4:12 PM
- Kristophr said...
-
Agreed, Anon.
If we were less moral, we could easily run the lot of them out of the country and still stay within the law.
Kratman's Caliphate
( electronic version is free at Baen books link ) is an example ... he has a real conservative bad guy win the US presidency ... the type the leftists keep accusing us of being.
One who immediately starts pardoning everyone who assassinates left wing judges and politicians, and encourages lefties to emigrate in order to continue breathing, since he refuses to protect them from angry conservatives. - 7/9/12, 1:56 PM