Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Franken Was Not Elected; He Was Imposed



York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots
177 people have been convicted -- not just accused, but convicted -- of voting fraudulently in the Senate race. Another 66 are awaiting trial.

Res Ipsa Loquitor
Allegations of fraud, they say, are little more than pretexts conjured up by Republicans to justify voter ID laws designed to suppress Democratic turnout.

That argument becomes much harder to make after reading a discussion of the 2008 Minnesota Senate race in "Who's Counting?", a new book by conservative journalist John Fund and former Bush Justice Department official Hans von Spakovsky.

 The election was particularly important because Franken's victory gave Senate Democrats a 60th vote in favor of President Obama's national health care proposal -- the deciding vote to overcome a Republican filibuster. If Coleman had kept his seat, there would have been no 60th vote, and no Obamacare.
Although the authors cover the whole range of voter fraud issues, their chapter on Minnesota is enough to convince any skeptic that there are times when voter fraud not only exists but can be critical to the outcome of a critical race. [Full]

You'd think this report would leave me with a sense of satisfaction; of justice being served.  In fact, it makes me furious.  That four years after the fact, the obvious to a certainty is treated as something of a revelation. In fact the Minnesota judges and officials knew, or should have known all  this when they handed the race to Franken.  This was no simple vote fraud.  It was a conspiracy to overthrow a government, and a way of life.  A capital offense. GAH! 


8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my apple ipad and tested to see if it can survive a 40 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now broken and she has 83 views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

I-RIGHT-I said...

One of many people who should be swinging from a tree. One of these days....

Anonymous said...

After the 2010 election, the college town of Ann Arbor, Michigan, was found to have over 20% more votes than registered voters.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

That's also true of Philadelphia after any election.

Kristophr said...

Let me guess ... all of the prosecutions are in rural counties?

cmblake6 said...

I completely agree with the furious statement. Knowing this, the votes should be recounted even now.

molonlabe28 said...

The disgraceful stolen victory by Jean Carnahan in the 2000 Mo. Senate race is also an example of Democratic voter fraud.

Someone filed a lawsuit alleging denial of his voting rights and demanded that polls be held open in downtown St. Louis (I lived there 30 years ago and was one of a handful of Republicans) for 2 or 3 hours.

The judge granted an order holding the polls open, thereby letting people vote multiple times and other shenanigans to occur.

As it turned out, the plaintiff in the lawsuit perjured himself because he had ALREADY VOTED when he filed the false lawsuit.

John Ashcroft, ever the gentleman, declined to go the distance by litigating over the validity of the results, letting Carnahan, along with the Mo/St L Democratic machine, steal the Senate seat.

Voter ID laws are a must to ensure, as best we can, fair and legal elections.

Tn adopted a voter ID law, which requires a "state-issued id" to vote.

The City of Memphis, which is run entirely by black Democrats, began having its libraries issue library cards with photos and sued the state election commission to demand the recognition of a library card as a state-issued id.

Mercifully, the Judge tossed the lawsuit, holding that library cards are not state-issued ids.

I think (and hope) that the Tn voted ID law will dramatically thin the ranks of voters in November.

mark said...

An equitable way to select suffrage would be to restrict voting to only those that pay taxes into the treasury.

If you don't contribute to the money pot, why should you have a say in how it is spent?

Just sayin' here that our current woes are because the takers are getting more votes than the givers.

Representation without taxation is WRONG!

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.