Wednesday, January 09, 2013

Pravda 2- NYT 0



                         
So, How Bad Is It?
                         



So bad that Pravda is now more reliable than the New York Times
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Res Ipsa Loquitor

What better way to staunch protests at worsening economic and life conditions than to make it feel like an honourable job/duty of the people to save "Gia". At the same time, they used this "science" as new pagan religion to further push out the Christianity they hate and despise and most of all, fear? Gia worship, the earth "mother", has been pushed in popular culture oozing out of the West for a better part of the past 1.5 decades. This is a religion replete with an army of priests, called Government Grant Scientists.

Various groups have fought back. This is including Russian hackers, who published a huge database of UK government, scientific and university emails depicting the fixing of data to sell Global Warming, er Climate Change (as if it never changed on its own). And while taking hit after hit, the beast, like Al Qaida, will not die. As a matter of fact, the beast is on a steady come back, as it is quite useful during the down times recession. The US alone spends $7 billion each year on warming "studies", which is, in truth, nothing but a huge money laundering operation, as no real science is conducted and vapid alarmist reports the only product generated. [Full]


This is not the first time this erstwhile Soviet propaganda rag has scored a direct hit (How galling is rhis?)  Heads up from Skoonj



7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Huh, The Soviet Union went bankrupt, pulled out of Afghanistan and divided up the country. Looks to me, we are on the same path. One thing to say for them, they divided relatively peacefully. I hope the death toll will be as low here.
ignore amos

Anonymous said...

Before the climate warming/global change crap but after the ozone hole and nuclear winter fraud attempts, magazine like Astronomy, Sky & Telescope and even Scientific American ran articles discussing drivers of climate. Precession in the Earth's spin axis and the moving Tropics of Cancer & Capricorn, cycles of change in the sun's heat output, etc. Then S.I. changed editorial staff and they jumped on Al Gore's wagon. That's when I realized they couldn't be trusted to be unbiased.
Can something that was once good, be recovered or do you have to burn the nest to kill the rats.
ignore amos

Rodger the Real King of France said...

That's a new-to-me insight young fella - well done.

Anonymous said...

"GAIA," you mean?

Rodger the Real King of France said...

"GAIA," you mean?

Don't know. Ask the author.

Revernd Idaho Spud said...

I have noticed in the last several months that many Pravda articles are what you might have expected to see in a conservative news source.

Anonymous said...

There may be many reasons why we might want to believe in an apocalypse but for the scientists involved it's very straightforward.

"It's easier to get funding if you can show some evidence for impending climate disasters. In the late 1970s it was the coming ice age and now it's the coming global warming. Who knows what it will be ten years from now. Sure, science benefits from scary scenarios." - Dr. Roy Spencer

"A lot of people are getting very famous and very well funded as a result of promoting the disastrous scenario of greenhouse warming."
- Dr. Sherwood Idso

"My suspicion is that if you have a crisis like this it's easier to gain funds for the profession as a whole." - Prof. Reginald Newell

I've had these quotes saved a long time - from before I thought to save the sources.
GrinfilledCelt

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.