|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Saturday, February 02, 2013
Women if Foxholes
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
12 comments:
-
-
Worms, meet can
MM - 2/2/13, 11:59 AM
-
-
I know what you're saying, "But Rodge, times are different. Men don't think like that anymore."
Yes...we do. - 2/2/13, 12:31 PM
-
-
As a young Midshipman going through Jump School at Fort Benning in the Summer of '79, we went through a string of student company commanders. The first fellow was a LtCol MD. He didn't make it through the last run of ground week. It's charitable calling the Airborne Shuffle a run. I did every single one of them hungover. His replacement was a female Army Captain admin type who should have been in the faculty lounge drinking coffee. The catcalls from the ranks were hilarious, she failed Tower Week. It was good to see her go. Her replacement was a Marine Recon newly promoted Captain. Let us say, the change was dramatic. All of a sudden, things were professionally and efficiently done. Imagine that.
There is a much larger story to be told, but it will never be admitted. In cultures where the masculine virtues are necessary, women taint the pool, and spoil the culture.
Rape? All the ones I knew were willing, dykes, or stone cold bitches.
Casca - 2/2/13, 1:22 PM
- Mike C said...
-
I went through basic in the winter of 1980. I was a slotted to be an Intel enlisted puke, so my fellow trainees were either more of the above, or rear-echelon support. That being said, they were a fairly hardy bunch. We had with our three male platoons, a platoon of female trainees. The drills knew we wern't going to combat arms, but the did their jobs and whipped us into shape. I'd say among the males, there was about a 10% attrition due to physical problems. For the females, it was more like 25% or more. Of the 30 or more females, there was only one that could consistently finish the run with the males. I say all that to say this - there might be a cadre of females out there that can keep up with they guys in the combat arms, but they are a very, very, small part of the population. It's just not risking weakening the rest to let them play. If you want to let them do this, let them sign on as males, and expect them to perform as males or get bounced out.
- 2/2/13, 2:26 PM
-
-
I have to say "ditto" to Mikes summation when I went through Basic and afterwards in the '90s.
I can only remeber ONE female that could physically "keep up" (and sometimes surpass) the average males that I graduated with. (To her credit; she had been professional beach Lifeguard in the real world.)
To be honest, I don't know how the vast number of "average" females passed the physical entrance exam, let alone any tests after that.
- 2/2/13, 3:20 PM
-
-
Physical strength and ability aside, the problem is boy and girls DISTRACT one another. Thats it plain and simple. When I joined the Navy, I'd nail anything that would hold still and let me. And when they get to he-ing and she-ing they cause problems. I watched for 20 years.
Tim
USN Rertired
- 2/2/13, 3:57 PM
-
-
Let us pray that the proposed legions of gold chain wearing, leering fanny patters never comes to fruition. -Anymouse
P.S. "The Whorah" - 2/2/13, 7:34 PM
- Hell_Is_Like_Newark said...
-
I know of only one effective female combat outfit in history. The Czar raised an outfit of female combat soldiers in WWI.
I remember seeing an old, silent video of them marching. Each and every one of them were huge beasts. They looked like they should be living under a bridge eating small children.
Even though the Czar's army found the 0.0001% of women who could take full combat, combat was not their primary roll. The Czar used them as propaganda to motivate via shame his reluctant forces to fight the Germans and Austrians.
Note: Yes, the Soviets did put women on the front lines in WWII. However, later in the war, the pulled them out of combat. The woman were getting slaughtered wholesale and were turning into a liability. - 2/3/13, 8:31 AM
-
-
I want Leon to tell me what is going to happen when Pvt Suzie Soldier gets an injury out there where bullets are whizzing by. Does he actually think that the average Joe Slogger is going to leave her and follow his orders, or will he drop his current task to render aid?
I want to know. I have my own thoughts on the subject. Just some more stress of decision making when all efforts should be at success and survival.
Bad idea.
tomw - 2/3/13, 10:56 AM
-
-
Fred Reed has some interesting numbers about Women In Combat
- 2/3/13, 2:25 PM
- Chadd said...
-
Retired Army Lieutenant Colonel and science fiction author Tom Kratman dissects the subject of women in combat in his article "The Amazon's Right Breast." http://www.baen.com/amazonsrightbreast.asp
This is probably the best argument against women in combat I've ever seen.
Chadd in Fl - 2/3/13, 8:04 PM
-
-
Jeez, I had forgot all about this.
Back in basic, in '71 at Ft. Lewis WA. we had a whole platoon of Eskimos from Alaska. I don't think the tallest one passed the minimum height requirement by more than 1/2".
Tough little buggers, they mostly kept to themselves.
OC - 2/4/13, 1:47 PM