Monday, October 28, 2013

Amd the answer is ...

Hitler's Mustache               

Feds Told GM To Drop Pontiac Or No Bailout, Ex-GM Exec Says

1. fascism

The only official definition of Fascism comes from Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, in which he outlines three principles of a fascist philosophy.

  • 1."Everything in the state". The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.
  • 2."Nothing outside the state". The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.
    Economic Fascism Planned Capitalism Lives On  When people hear the word “fascism” they naturally think of its ugly racism and anti-Semitism as practiced by the totalitarian regimes of Mussolini and Hitler. But there was also an economic policy component of fascism, known in Europe during the 1920s and ‘30s as “corporatism,” that was an essential ingredient of economic totalitarianism as practiced by Mussolini and Hitler. So-called corporatism was adopted in Italy and Germany during the 1930s and was held up as a “model” by quite a few intellectuals and policy makers in the United States and Europe. A version of economic fascism was in fact adopted in the United States in the 1930s and survives to this day. In the United States these policies were not called “fascism” but “planned capitalism.” The word fascism may no longer be politically acceptable, but its synonym “industrial policy” is as popular as ever.JUNE 01, 1994 by THOMAS J. DILORENZO
  • 3."Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.
The use of militarism was implied only as a means to accomplish one of the three above principles, mainly to keep the people and rest of the world in line. Fascist countries are known for their harmony and lack of internal strife. There are no conflicting parties or elections in fascist countries. Urban Dictionary

Nazi Germany was extreme Fascism, better examples of fascist countries were Mussolini's Italy, Iraq, Iran, and the Democrat, or "Progressive,"  party government  that's  emerged in the United States..
Unlike communism, fascists realized bureaucrats could never make the trains run on time.  The solution-  leave industry in the hands of businessmen, but make them do what you want.  It's that simple.



7 comments:

iri said...

"The solution- leave industry in the hands of businessmen, but make them do what you want. It's that simple."

The golden handshake handed to failed and crooked executives and lawmakers at the expense of the stockholders, consumers and American public is a big part of what makes this work so well.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Shareholders have a responsibility to keep tabs, and revolt if they don't like what's happening. If they don't, be it on their heads. Life's a bitch.

Esteve said...

Hey, at least my '04 Bonneville is a "collectable classic" now (in my dreams).

Anonymous said...

What we have here, is creeping fascism in the guise of socialism. Doesn't matter if it's coming from the left or the right, it ends up in the same place.

jd

Steve in Greensboro said...

“There seems to be no question that [Mussolini] is really interested in what we are doing and I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished and by his evidenced honest purpose of restoring Italy.” This was FDR talking about how much he admired Mussolini, and how much Mussolini admired FDR and the New Deal. You know, a fascist mutual admiration society.

Wabano said...

Most harmless and kindly person...George Bernard Shaw, praising Mussolini...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDR4EVgVLC4

Irony, the Democrats say...riiiight...

Anonymous said...

RKOF:Shareholders have a responsibility to keep tabs, and revolt if they don't like what's happening. If they don't, be it on their heads. Life's a bitch.

Sorry, but the majority of shares are held by retirement funds such as CALPERS. With CALPERS directors sitting on their hands, there can be no 'revolt' of the shareholders when the board decides to pay them self millions, offer golden parachutes, and so on. The CALPERS types are NOT DOING THEIR JOB, and are allowing so many boards to use the investors' capital for personal purposes. See that Dennis something with the $1000 shower curtain and million dollar parties. The boards did nothing because the individual shareholders are out voted by the 'professional' share holders in retirement funds.
Just my opinion.
tomw

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.