“ |
Knock-Knock
"I felt it first hand when I was, you know, reporting on the presidential race," Costello noted. "I mean President Obama's people can be quite nasty. They don't like you to say anything bad about their boss, and they're not afraid to use whatever means they have at hand to stop you from doing that, including threatening your job." [Full]
|
” |
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Friday, October 25, 2013
An old new story. Or, new old ...?"
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
8 comments:
-
-
"And nobody heard much about them.."
As if anybody that mattered needed to be told.
- 10/25/13, 8:31 PM
-
-
I think Clinton set the standard when he brought you to the park and had you shot.
- 10/26/13, 5:42 AM
-
-
You are right Rodger, the legacy media is an embarassment, servile, cringing toadies to the Total State. But, paraphrasing the immortal Senator Jesse Helms, "I don’t care what the New York Times says, and no one I care about cares what the New York Times says.”
- 10/26/13, 7:19 AM
-
-
Lincoln is the gold standard here. Elected by a slim minority, mostly hated in the US he comes to office prepared to deal with the pushback against his agenda he knows is coming. He suspends Habeas Corpus before any hostilities. He arrests people that speak out against him and never file charges so they can defend themselves. He has an Immigrant army of Irish thugs that smash the printing operations of many newspapers who dare criticize his agenda. He even arrested the Chief Supreme Court justice Roger Tanney for saying his actions are wildly unconstitutional.
Oh my brother, WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE. Everything I mentioned happened to Northeners. HIS people.
Hey, remember when Barry took the oath at the Lincoln Memorial. Nothing to see here folks. - 10/26/13, 8:00 AM
-
-
Northern Democrats, not "his" people.
Casca - 10/26/13, 2:53 PM
- Wabano said...
-
Yes, Southrons wanted the same economic system "enjoyed" by the Romans and the Muslims,
where a tiny minority lived off the toils of the enslaved population...Systematic rapes
of the female slaves obtained white slave children, 30% of all slaves, the rest of the blacks was to
be deported to Liberia, Africa, which had been established by Southron slave holders.
Wy, it’s jest ez clear ez figgers,
Clear ez one an’ one make two,
Chaps thet make black slaves o’ niggers
Want to make wite slaves o’ you.
Beating Lincoln was supposed to permit the enslavement of all the Irish,
Jews, Germans and other assorted Catholics...
"George Fitzhugh, the South main ideologue, talked about free society in the North being a failure and universal slavery, not based on color, being the only successful alternative. He declared, “Ten years ago we became satisfied that slavery, black or white, was right and necessary. We advocated this doctrine in very many essays.” Fitzhugh explained, “More than half of the white citizens of the North are common laborers, either in the field, or as body or house servants. They perform the same services that our slaves do.” White laborers received no money when they were ill or when no work was available. They worked long hours for very low wages and were living in poverty, which in turn led to crime and an undermining of free society. Slaves, on the other hand, did not have to fend for themselves, and they were taken care of with food, clothing, and shelter. Free society was a failure. Slave society was a success. Fitzhugh later wrote, “White slavery, not black, has been the normal element of civilized society.... He who justifies mere negro slavery, and condemns other forms of slavery, does not think at all…. Domestic slavery must be vindicated in the abstract... without regard to race or color.” Fitzhugh’s thinking evolved, and as shown in observations he made in 1858, he came to believe that white slaves were better than black slaves. “European slaves have ever been almost all of the white race. Negro slavery is of very recent origin.... To say the white race is not the true and best slave race is to contradict all history.” If the Union could not exist half slave and half free, the nationalization of slavery, with white laborers in the North being enslaved as well, was the better alternative. This was a major theme in Southern politics from the mid-1850s to 1860.9
In 1855 Fitzhugh wrote a very famous and often quoted, albeit anonymous, editorial for the Richmond Enquirer. Fitzhugh said, “The Bible...ordained, authorized and enforced white slavery,” and that “slavery in the abstract” was right. “The laws of all the Southern States justified the holding [of] white men in slavery, provided, through the mother, they were descended, however remotely, from a negro slave. The bright [white] mulattoes,” said Fitzhugh, were not “wrongfully held in slavery.” The universality of the right to enslave was affirmed with, “The South now maintains that slavery is right, natural, and necessary,” and “the principle of slavery is itself right, and does not depend on difference of complexion.”10
"
But what can you expect from Democrats...They still all vote even for Barry Hussein down there! - 10/26/13, 7:26 PM
-
-
The American version of Neimoller's speech can be found here: http://gunslingersjournal.blogspot.com/2013/10/outright-stole-this-from-my-friend.html
- 10/27/13, 10:44 AM
-
-
"
But what can you expect from Democrats...They still all vote even for Barry Hussein down there!
# posted by Blogger Wabano : 10/26/13, 7:26 PM"
And of course, any discussion of Lincoln's abuses immediately gets turned into a referendum on slavery.
Yes, Slavery was evil. Can we move on to the point that Lincoln did tyrannical things?
- 10/27/13, 12:53 PM