Thursday, December 11, 2014

What? Democrats Lied?





John Yoo Demolishes the Democrats’ Partisan ‘Torture’ Report






The anti-American Left strikes again

Gee, that’s too damn bad

No one better to do so than Yoo

The release of a Senate report on Bush-era interrogation policies could have prompted an informed, responsible debate over intelligence and the war on terror. But not the report that saw the light of day Tuesday. Because of fundamental mistakes made at its very birth, Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s accounting offers a dispiriting, partisan attack on American intelligence agencies at a time when we need them more than ever.

Bizarrely, Feinstein and her staffers refused even to interview the very CIA officials who ordered and carried out the program in question. Because Republicans saw where the train was headed, they refused to participate in the review. The slanted approach to the investigation sadly colored its conclusions — which are questionable, to put it charitably.

Yoo lays out the shameless partisanship of the Democrats’ heading-out-the-door-and-into-the-electoral-wilderness poke in the eye of the Bush administration, of which John (full disclosure: we’re friends) was an important part. He’s one of the  smartest guys I know, so pay attention:

As a Justice Department lawyer who worked on the legality of the interrogation methods in 2002, I believed that the federal law prohibiting torture allowed the CIA to use interrogation methods that did not cause injury — including, in extraordinary cases, waterboarding — because of the grave threat to the nation’s security in the months after the 9/11 attacks.

I was swayed by the fact that our military used waterboarding in training thousands of its own soldiers without harm, and that the CIA would use the technique only on top Al Qaeda leaders thought to have actionable information on pending plots.

Does anybody, besides the bedwetters in the media, really care about whether a few al-Qaeda operatives were discomfited by “harsh” interrogation techniques? Tell Saul Alinsky to take his Rule No. 4 and shove it. As Mr. Dooley should have said, war ain’t beanbag. [Full]

What? Want more? Cheney: Report ‘Full of Crap’ to Say CIA Misled Bush on Interrogation Program

5 comments:

Murphy(AZ) said...

How's this for a compromise: we pick someone for a test subject; say, possibly, well, Senator Feinstein, as an example, and subject HER to the so-called tortures and mis-treatments visited on these poor, unfortunate Terrorists who just happened to fall under the influence of all those wicked people working for the C.I.A.

Then, when all is said and done, we put it up to a vote of her colleagues in the Senate: id Di-Fi deserve to be water-boarded? Sleep deprived? Threatened with power tools? Forced to sit through replays of Joe Biden speeches?

I'm willing to bet a paycheck that she goes down, 100% to 0%, friends and foes alike, and then we can do all those mean, evil and wicked things TO HER!!!

Jess said...

I'd pay to see a few of those lying sacks of crap in Washington waterboarded. I have the feeling, after only a few minutes, Benghazi would be completely explained.

0007 said...

How's 'bout we do that AND ask her about all the crooked deals she made all her money on while "working for the people". When she tells all she can't complain about "torture" not working.

markshere2 said...

The moslems just found out the details of our "Torture" and laughed because between female genital mutilation and stoning, they treat their wives and daughters much worse then we treat enemy combatants.

markshere2 said...

The moslems just found out the details of our "Torture" and laughed because between female genital mutilation and stoning, they treat their wives and daughters much worse then we treat enemy combatants.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.